Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lyuhao Chen

dblp:361/0358 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 58% Language models and text generation · 36% Information extraction and text analysis · 6%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
table question answering
1.522024
Revisiting Automated Evaluation for Long-form Table Question Answering · EMNLP 2024
TaPERA: Enhancing Faithfulness and Interpretability in Long-Form Table QA by Content Planning and Execution-based Reasoning · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › table question answering
table reasoning
0.912025
Table-R1: Inference-Time Scaling for Table Reasoning Tasks · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning
0.812024
DocMath-Eval: Evaluating Math Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs in Understanding Financial Documents · ACL (1) 2024
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.812024
Revisiting Automated Evaluation for Long-form Table Question Answering · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.522024
Revisiting Automated Evaluation for Long-form Table Question Answering · EMNLP 2024
TaPERA: Enhancing Faithfulness and Interpretability in Long-Form Table QA by Content Planning and Execution-based Reasoning · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
test-time scaling
0.312025
Table-R1: Inference-Time Scaling for Table Reasoning Tasks · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document understanding
financial document analysis
0.212024
DocMath-Eval: Evaluating Math Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs in Understanding Financial Documents · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-evaluation · 1.5human annotation · 1.5reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards · 0.9distillation · 0.9GRPO · 0.9prompting · 0.8program execution · 0.8modular decomposition · 0.8large language model · 0.8content planning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Table-R1: Inference-Time Scaling for Table Reasoning Tasks
abstract
In this work, we present the first study to explore inference-time scaling on table reasoning tasks.We develop and evaluate two post-training strategies to enable inferencetime scaling: distillation from frontier model reasoning traces and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR).For distillation, we introduce a large-scale dataset of reasoning traces generated by DeepSeek-R1, which we use to fine-tune LLMs into the Table-R1-SFT model.For RLVR, we propose taskspecific verifiable reward functions and apply the GRPO algorithm to obtain the Table-R1-Zero model.We evaluate our Table-R1series models across diverse table reasoning tasks, including short-form QA, fact verification, and free-form QA.Notably, the Table-R1-Zero model matches or exceeds the performance of GPT-4.1 and DeepSeek-R1, while using only a 7B-parameter LLM.It also demonstrates strong generalization to out-of-domain datasets.Extensive ablation and qualitative analyses reveal the benefits of instruction tuning, model architecture choices, and cross-task generalization, as well as emergence of essential table reasoning skills during RL training.Model huggingface.co/Table-R1Code github.com/Table-R1
Zheyuan Yang, Lyuhao Chen, Arman Cohan, Yilun Zhao 0001
EMNLP2
2024 TaPERA: Enhancing Faithfulness and Interpretability in Long-Form Table QA by Content Planning and Execution-based Reasoning
abstract
Long-form Table Question Answering (LFTQA) requires systems to generate paragraph long and complex answers to questions over tabular data.While Large language models based systems have made significant progress, it often hallucinates, especially when the task involves complex reasoning over tables.To tackle this issue, we propose a new LLM-based framework, TAPERA, for LFTQA tasks.Our framework uses a modular approach that decomposes the whole process into three sub-modules: 1) QA-based Content Planner that iteratively decomposes the input question into sub-questions; 2) Execution-based Table Reasoner that produces executable Python program for each sub-question; and 3) Answer Generator that generates long-form answer grounded on the program output.Human evaluation results on the FETAQA and QTSUMM datasets indicate that our framework significantly improves strong baselines on both accuracy and truthfulness, as our modular framework is better at table reasoning, and the long-form answer is always consistent with the program output.Our modular design further provides transparency as users are able to interact with our framework by manually changing the content plans.https://github.com/yilunzhao/TaPERAWithin the Oil and Gas industry, Sinopec Group earns the highest profit -$6,205 million.However, compared to the most profitable company overall, Apple, the profit earned by Sinopec Group is much lower.In fact, Apple earns $51,306 million more profit than Sinopec Group.
Yilun Zhao 0001, Lyuhao Chen, Arman Cohan, Chen Zhao 0013
ACL (1)2
2024 DocMath-Eval: Evaluating Math Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs in Understanding Financial Documents
abstract
Yilun Zhao, Yitao Long, Hongjun Liu, Ryo Kamoi, Linyong Nan, Lyuhao Chen, Yixin Liu, Xiangru Tang, Rui Zhang, Arman Cohan. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Yilun Zhao 0001, Yitao Long, Hongjun Liu 0001, Ryo Kamoi, Linyong Nan, Lyuhao Chen, Yixin Liu 0003, Xiangru Tang, Rui Zhang 0037, Arman Cohan
ACL (1)6
2024 Revisiting Automated Evaluation for Long-form Table Question Answering
abstract
In the era of data-driven decision-making, Long-Form Table Question Answering (LFTQA) is essential for integrating structured data with complex reasoning.Despite recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) for LFTQA, evaluating their effectiveness remains a significant challenge.We introduce LFTQA-Eval, a meta-evaluation dataset comprising 2,988 human-annotated examples, to rigorously assess the efficacy of current automated metrics in assessing LLM-based LFTQA systems, with a focus on faithfulness and comprehensiveness.Our findings reveal that existing automatic metrics poorly correlate with human judgments and fail to consistently differentiate between factually accurate responses and those that are coherent but factually incorrect.Additionally, our in-depth examination of the limitations associated with automated evaluation methods provides essential insights for the improvement of LFTQA automated evaluation.
Lyuhao Chen, Songcheng Cai, Yilun Zhao 0001
EMNLP2