Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Junxiao Yang

dblp:361/0433 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%
Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Language models and text generation · 18% Representation and self-supervised learning · 14%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
jailbreak attack
2.632026
When Smiley Turns Hostile: Interpreting How Emojis Trigger LLMs' Toxicity · AAAI 2026
Guiding not Forcing: Enhancing the Transferability of Jailbreaking Attacks on LLMs via Removing Superfluous Constraints · ACL (1) 2025
Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks Through Goal Prioritization · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.222026
LASA: Language-Agnostic Semantic Alignment at the Semantic Bottleneck for LLM Safety · ACL (1) 2026
Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks Through Goal Prioritization · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › model explanation
global explanation
1.012026
When Smiley Turns Hostile: Interpreting How Emojis Trigger LLMs' Toxicity · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.012026
When Smiley Turns Hostile: Interpreting How Emojis Trigger LLMs' Toxicity · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model safety
1.012026
LASA: Language-Agnostic Semantic Alignment at the Semantic Bottleneck for LLM Safety · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
semantic alignment
1.012026
LASA: Language-Agnostic Semantic Alignment at the Semantic Bottleneck for LLM Safety · ACL (1) 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning
large language model security
1.012026
When Smiley Turns Hostile: Interpreting How Emojis Trigger LLMs' Toxicity · AAAI 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning
toxic content generation
1.012026
When Smiley Turns Hostile: Interpreting How Emojis Trigger LLMs' Toxicity · AAAI 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
0.912025
Guiding not Forcing: Enhancing the Transferability of Jailbreaking Attacks on LLMs via Removing Superfluous Constraints · ACL (1) 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
transferable adversarial attack
0.912025
Guiding not Forcing: Enhancing the Transferability of Jailbreaking Attacks on LLMs via Removing Superfluous Constraints · ACL (1) 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › large language model safety
jailbreak defense
0.812024
Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks Through Goal Prioritization · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI safety
safety alignment
0.522025
Guiding not Forcing: Enhancing the Transferability of Jailbreaking Attacks on LLMs via Removing Superfluous Constraints · ACL (1) 2025
Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks Through Goal Prioritization · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large reasoning model
0.312026
How Should We Enhance the Safety of Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical Study · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tokenization analysis · 2.0semantic cognition analysis · 2.0prompt construction · 2.0gradient-based optimization · 1.7goal prioritization · 1.5fine-tuning · 1.5semantic bottleneck · 1.0representation alignment · 1.0empirical study · 1.0jailbreak attacks · 0.9jailbreak attack · 0.9inference-time steering · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 When Smiley Turns Hostile: Interpreting How Emojis Trigger LLMs' Toxicity
abstract
Emojis are globally used non-verbal cues in digital communication, and extensive research has examined how large language models (LLMs) understand and utilize emojis across contexts. While usually associated with friendliness or playfulness, it is observed that emojis may trigger toxic content generation in LLMs. Motivated by such a observation, we aim to investigate: (1) whether emojis can clearly enhance the toxicity generation in LLMs and (2) how to interpret this phenomenon.* We begin with a comprehensive exploration of emoji-triggered LLM toxicity generation by automating the construction of prompts with emojis to subtly express toxic intent. Experiments across 5 mainstream languages on 7 famous LLMs along with jailbreak tasks demonstrate that prompts with emojis could easily induce toxicity generation. To understand this phenomenon, we conduct model-level interpretations spanning semantic cognition, sequence generation and tokenization, suggesting that emojis can act as a heterogeneous semantic channel to bypass the safety mechanisms. To pursue deeper insights, we further probe the pre-training corpus and uncover potential correlation between the emoji-related data polution with the toxicity generation behaviors.
Shiyao Cui, Xijia Feng, Yingkang Wang, Junxiao Yang, Zhexin Zhang, Biplab Sikdar 0001, Hongning Wang, Han Qiu 0001, Minlie Huang
AAAI4
2026 LASA: Language-Agnostic Semantic Alignment at the Semantic Bottleneck for LLM Safety
abstract
Junxiao Yang, Haoran Liu, Jinzhe Tu, Jiale Cheng, Zhexin Zhang, Shiyao Cui, Jiaqi Weng, Jialing Tao, Hui Xue, Hongning Wang, Han Qiu, Minlie Huang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Junxiao Yang, Jinzhe Tu, Zhexin Zhang, Shiyao Cui, Jiaqi Weng, Jialing Tao, Hongning Wang, Han Qiu 0001, Minlie Huang
ACL (1)1
2026 How Should We Enhance the Safety of Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical Study
abstract
Zhexin Zhang, Xian Qi Loye, Victor Shea-Jay Huang, Junxiao Yang, Qi Zhu, Shiyao Cui, Fei Mi, Lifeng Shang, Yingkang Wang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Zhexin Zhang, Xian Qi Loye, Victor Shea-Jay Huang, Junxiao Yang, Qi Zhu 0011, Shiyao Cui, Fei Mi, Lifeng Shang, Yingkang Wang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
ACL (1)4
2026 G-GBC: A Gaussian mixture-based granular ball computing method for robust CNN classification under noisy labels
Junxiao Yang, Qiang Liu 0021, Xuemei Cao 0001, Xin Yang 0012
Knowl. Based Syst.1
2025 Guiding not Forcing: Enhancing the Transferability of Jailbreaking Attacks on LLMs via Removing Superfluous Constraints
abstract
Jailbreaking attacks can effectively induce unsafe behaviors in Large Language Models (LLMs); however, the transferability of these attacks across different models remains limited. This study aims to understand and enhance the transferability of gradient-based jailbreaking methods, which are among the standard approaches for attacking white-box models. Through a detailed analysis of the optimization process, we introduce a novel conceptual framework to elucidate transferability and identify superfluous constraints—specifically, the response pattern constraint and the token tail constraint—as significant barriers to improved transferability. Removing these unnecessary constraints substantially enhances the transferability and controllability of gradient-based attacks. Evaluated on Llama-3-8B-Instruct as the source model, our method increases the overall Transfer Attack Success Rate (T-ASR) across a set of target models with varying safety levels from 18.4% to 50.3%, while also improving the stability and controllability of jailbreak behaviors on both source and target models.
Junxiao Yang, Zhexin Zhang, Shiyao Cui, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
ACL (1)1
2024 Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks Through Goal Prioritization
abstract
While significant attention has been dedicated to exploiting weaknesses in LLMs through jailbreaking attacks, there remains a paucity of effort in defending against these attacks.We point out a pivotal factor contributing to the success of jailbreaks: the intrinsic conflict between the goals of being helpful and ensuring safety.Accordingly, we propose to integrate goal prioritization at both training and inference stages to counteract.Implementing goal prioritization during inference substantially diminishes the Attack Success Rate (ASR) of jailbreaking from 66.4% to 3.6% for ChatGPT.And integrating goal prioritization into model training reduces the ASR from 71.0% to 6.6% for Llama2-13B.Remarkably, even in scenarios where no jailbreaking samples are included during training, our approach slashes the ASR by half.Additionally, our findings reveal that while stronger LLMs face greater safety risks, they also possess a greater capacity to be steered towards defending against such attacks, both because of their stronger ability in instruction following.Our work thus contributes to the comprehension of jailbreaking attacks and defenses, and sheds light on the relationship between LLMs' capability and safety.Our code is available at https://github.com/thu-coai/ JailbreakDefense_GoalPriority.
Zhexin Zhang, Junxiao Yang, Pei Ke, Fei Mi, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
ACL (1)2