Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Joel Mire

dblp:361/0451 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-6230-4229ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 48% Language models and text generation · 24% Trustworthy machine learning · 20%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-AI interaction · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 56% Web and social media mining · 44%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
dialectal variation
1.012026
Black LLMirror: User (Self) Perceptions in Black American English Interactions with LLMs · CHI 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
narrative understanding
1.012026
Social Story Frames: Contextual Reasoning about Narrative Intent and Reception · ACL (1) 2026
Computational social science and digital humanities › text analysis › discourse analysis
narrative analysis
0.812024
HEART-felt Narratives: Tracing Empathy and Narrative Style in Personal Stories with LLMs · EMNLP 2024
Computational social science and digital humanities › social media analysis
social media text analysis
0.812024
The Empirical Variability of Narrative Perceptions of Social Media Texts · EMNLP 2024
Web and social media mining
online community analysis
0.812024
Where Do People Tell Stories Online? Story Detection Across Online Communities · ACL (1) 2024
Data mining
text mining
0.812024
Where Do People Tell Stories Online? Story Detection Across Online Communities · ACL (1) 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
contextual reasoning
0.312026
Social Story Frames: Contextual Reasoning about Narrative Intent and Reception · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.312026
Black LLMirror: User (Self) Perceptions in Black American English Interactions with LLMs · CHI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias in language models
language bias
0.312026
Black LLMirror: User (Self) Perceptions in Black American English Interactions with LLMs · CHI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.212024
The Empirical Variability of Narrative Perceptions of Social Media Texts · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
LLM-based annotation
0.212024
HEART-felt Narratives: Tracing Empathy and Narrative Style in Personal Stories with LLMs · EMNLP 2024
Data mining
pattern mining
0.212024
Where Do People Tell Stories Online? Story Detection Across Online Communities · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

taxonomy-based prompting · 2.3crowdsourcing · 2.3user study · 2.0mixed-methods analysis · 2.0open coding · 1.5transformer-based models · 0.8span-level classification · 0.8crowdworker annotation · 0.8crowd worker annotation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Social Story Frames: Contextual Reasoning about Narrative Intent and Reception
abstract
Joel Mire, Maria Antoniak, Steven R Wilson, Zexin Ma, Achyutarama R Ganti, Andrew Piper, Maarten Sap. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Joel Mire, Maria Antoniak, Steven R. Wilson 0001, Zexin Ma, Achyutarama R. Ganti, Andrew Piper, Maarten Sap
ACL (1)1
2026 Black LLMirror: User (Self) Perceptions in Black American English Interactions with LLMs
abstract
LLMs becoming increasingly personalized to users’ language style raises both excitement and concerns for minority users such as Black American English (BAE) speakers. Yet, previous work has predominantly focused on user perceptions of out-of-context BAE statements by LLMs rather than naturalistic multi-turn interactions, and has ignored such systems’ effects on users’ self-perception. In this work, we examine the effects that multi-turn interactions with speech and text BAE-producing LLMs have on BAE speakers’ perceptions of the LLM and of themselves. We observe a significant change in participant self-esteem following the interactions, and notable qualitative differences between BAE-LLM and Standard American English (SAE) LLM interactions. We also observe significant effects of BAE-usage on user perception of the model within speech-based interactions. Our findings suggest that the effects of BAE-usage by an LLM agent on model- and self-perception among BAE-speaking users are complex and widely varied.
Mikayla Campbell, Joel Mire, Mark Diaz, Maarten Sap
CHI2
2024 Where Do People Tell Stories Online? Story Detection Across Online Communities
abstract
Story detection in online communities is a challenging task as stories are scattered across communities and interwoven with non-storytelling spans within a single text.We address this challenge by building and releasing the StorySeeker toolkit, including a richly annotated dataset of 502 Reddit posts and comments, a detailed codebook adapted to the social media context, and models to predict storytelling at the document and span levels.Our dataset is sampled from hundreds of popular Englishlanguage Reddit communities ranging across 33 topic categories, and it contains fine-grained expert annotations, including binary story labels, story spans, and event spans.We evaluate a range of detection methods using our data, and we identify the distinctive textual features of online storytelling, focusing on storytelling spans.We illuminate distributional characteristics of storytelling on a large communitycentric social media platform, and we also conduct a case study on r/ChangeMyView, where storytelling is used as one of many persuasive strategies, illustrating that our data and models can be used for both inter-and intra-community research.Finally, we discuss implications of our tools and analyses for narratology and the study of online communities.
Maria Antoniak, Joel Mire, Maarten Sap, Elliott Ash, Andrew Piper
ACL (1)2
2024 The Empirical Variability of Narrative Perceptions of Social Media Texts
abstract
Most NLP work on narrative detection has focused on prescriptive definitions of stories crafted by researchers, leaving open the questions: how do crowd workers perceive texts to be a story, and why?We investigate this by building STORYPERCEPTIONS, a dataset of 2,496 perceptions of storytelling in 502 social media texts from 255 crowd workers, including categorical labels along with free-text storytelling rationales, authorial intent, and more.We construct a fine-grained bottom-up taxonomy of crowd workers' varied and nuanced perceptions of storytelling by open-coding their free-text rationales.Through comparative analyses at the label and code level, we illuminate patterns of disagreement among crowd workers and across other annotation contexts, including prescriptive labeling from researchers and LLM-based predictions.Notably, plot complexity, references to generalized or abstract actions, and holistic aesthetic judgments (such as a sense of cohesion) are especially important in disagreements.Our empirical findings broaden understanding of the types, relative importance, and contentiousness of features relevant to narrative detection, highlighting opportunities for future work on reader-contextualized models of narrative reception.
Joel Mire, Maria Antoniak, Elliott Ash, Andrew Piper, Maarten Sap
EMNLP1
2024 HEART-felt Narratives: Tracing Empathy and Narrative Style in Personal Stories with LLMs
abstract
Empathy serves as a cornerstone in enabling prosocial behaviors, and can be evoked through sharing of personal experiences in stories.While empathy is influenced by narrative content, intuitively, people respond to the way a story is told as well, through narrative style.Yet the relationship between empathy and narrative style is not fully understood.In this work, we empirically examine and quantify this relationship between style and empathy using LLMs and large-scale crowdsourcing studies.We introduce a novel, theory-based taxonomy, HEART (Human Empathy and Narrative Taxonomy) that delineates elements of narrative style that can lead to empathy with the narrator of a story.We establish the performance of LLMs in extracting narrative elements from HEART, showing that prompting with our taxonomy leads to reasonable, human-level annotations beyond what prior lexicon-based methods can do.To show empirical use of our taxonomy, we collect a dataset of empathy judgments of stories via a large-scale crowdsourcing study with N = 2, 624 participants.1 We show that narrative elements extracted via LLMs, in particular, vividness of emotions and plot volume, can elucidate the pathways by which narrative style cultivates empathy towards personal stories.Our work suggests that such models can be used for narrative analyses that lead to human-centered social and behavioral insights.1. Flatness/roundness (Keen, 2006) of the charac-
Jocelyn Shen, Joel Mire, Hae Park, Cynthia Breazeal, Maarten Sap
EMNLP2