Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daria Savchenko
dblp:361/1748
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-6916-8106ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction › AI-assisted writing
creative writing support |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Where to Hide a Stolen Elephant: Leaps in Creative Writing with Multimodal Machine Intelligence · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 1.3interviews · 1.3elicitation · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Where to Hide a Stolen Elephant: Leaps in Creative Writing with Multimodal Machine IntelligenceabstractWhile developing a story, novices and published writers alike have had to look outside themselves for inspiration. Language models have recently been able to generate text fluently, producing new stochastic narratives upon request. However, effectively integrating such capabilities with human cognitive faculties and creative processes remains challenging. We propose to investigate this integration with a multimodal writing support interface that offers writing suggestions textually, visually, and aurally. We conduct an extensive study that combines elicitation of prior expectations before writing, observation and semi-structured interviews during writing, and outcome evaluations after writing. Our results illustrate the individual and situational variation in machine-in-the-loop writing approaches, suggestion acceptance, and ways the system is helpful. Centrally, we report how participants perform integrative leaps , by which they do cognitive work to integrate suggestions of varying semantic relevance into their developing stories. We interpret these findings, offering modeling and design recommendations for future creative writing support technologies. Nikhil Singh 0003, Guillermo Bernal, Daria Savchenko, Elena L. Glassman |
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. | 3 |