EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhixin Han
dblp:361/4065
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 46% Question answering and dialogue systems · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 20% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
aspect-based sentiment analysis |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | DEQA: Descriptions Enhanced Question-Answering Framework for Multimodal Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis · AAAI 2025 BvSP: Broad-view Soft Prompting for Few-Shot Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction · ACL (1) 2024 |
Data mining
clustering |
1.3 | 2 | 2026 | CIDC: Cluster Identification-Guided Dual Correction for Robust Short Text Clustering · WWW 2026 HCDS: Hierarchical Clustering for Cold-Start Few-Shot Data Selection · SIGIR 2025 |
Data mining › clustering
deep clustering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CIDC: Cluster Identification-Guided Dual Correction for Robust Short Text Clustering · WWW 2026 |
Data mining › clustering › document clustering
short text clustering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CIDC: Cluster Identification-Guided Dual Correction for Robust Short Text Clustering · WWW 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › interactive question answering
conversational question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DEQA: Descriptions Enhanced Question-Answering Framework for Multimodal Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | HCDS: Hierarchical Clustering for Cold-Start Few-Shot Data Selection · SIGIR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
few-shot example selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | HCDS: Hierarchical Clustering for Cold-Start Few-Shot Data Selection · SIGIR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis › aspect-based sentiment analysis
multimodal aspect-based sentiment analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DEQA: Descriptions Enhanced Question-Answering Framework for Multimodal Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multimodal question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DEQA: Descriptions Enhanced Question-Answering Framework for Multimodal Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DEQA: Descriptions Enhanced Question-Answering Framework for Multimodal Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis › aspect-based sentiment analysis
aspect sentiment quad prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BvSP: Broad-view Soft Prompting for Few-Shot Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction · ACL (1) 2024 |
Data mining › clustering
hierarchical clustering |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | HCDS: Hierarchical Clustering for Cold-Start Few-Shot Data Selection · SIGIR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
few-shot prompting |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | BvSP: Broad-view Soft Prompting for Few-Shot Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction · ACL (1) 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
prompt learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | BvSP: Broad-view Soft Prompting for Few-Shot Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction · ACL (1) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
representation-level clustering · 1.7pseudo-labeling · 1.7contrastive clustering · 1.7prototype-based correction · 1.0cluster category identification · 1.0multimodal large language model · 0.9multi-expert ensemble · 0.9GPT-4 · 0.9soft prompting · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CIDC: Cluster Identification-Guided Dual Correction for Robust Short Text ClusteringabstractThe rapid growth of online short texts has made specialized analysis essential, as these texts are sparse and information-limited. Short text clustering (STC) is critical for automatically grouping unlabeled texts into meaningful clusters, supporting applications such as sentiment analysis, spam filtering, and social media personalization. In the context of massive online content, deep clustering seeks to uncover semantic categories by measuring distances in the representation space. Consequently, aligning clustering pseudo-labels with the true category distribution is crucial for effective self-supervised training, particularly under class imbalance and distribution skew commonly observed in web data. To address this challenge, we propose the Cluster Identification-Guided Dual Correction (CIDC) framework, which generates reliable pseudo-labels to guide deep clustering. Specifically, given cluster partitions and model-estimated class distributions, we perform Cluster Category Identification (CCI) at each training epoch to determine the most probable category for each cluster. This identification provides the foundation for the Pseudo-Label Correction (PLC) and Prototype-Based Correction (PBC) modules, which jointly enhance pseudo-label reliability and representation learning. In the PLC module, samples whose model-estimated class distributions conflict with the assigned cluster category are corrected, thereby improving semantic alignment within clusters. In the PBC module, representative and reliable prototypes are selected according to cluster categories and model predictions to guide training, further strengthening representation discriminability. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CIDC consistently outperforms existing methods in terms of clustering accuracy and mutual information, particularly in unsupervised settings characterized by class imbalance and noisy data. Yuhua Zhao 0001, Zhixin Han, Peiyu Xu, Hang Gao 0003, Mengting Hu 0002, Tiegang Gao |
WWW | 2 |
| 2025 | DEQA: Descriptions Enhanced Question-Answering Framework for Multimodal Aspect-Based Sentiment AnalysisabstractMultimodal aspect-based sentiment analysis (MABSA) integrates text and images to perform fine-grained sentiment analysis on specific aspects, enhancing the understanding of user opinions in various applications. Existing methods use modality alignment for information interaction and fusion between images and text, but an inherent gap between these two modalities necessitates a more direct bridging mechanism to effectively connect image understanding with text content. For this, we propose the Descriptions Enhanced Question-Answering Framework (DEQA), which generates descriptions of images using GPT-4, leveraging the multimodal large language model to provide more direct semantic context of images. In DEQA, to help the model better understand the task's purpose, we frame MABSA as a multi-turn question-answering problem to add semantic guidance and hints. We input text, image, and description into separate experts in various combinations, allowing each expert to focus on different features and thereby improving the comprehensive utilization of input information. By integrating these expert outputs within a multi-turn question-answering format, we employ a multi-expert ensemble decision-making approach to produce the final prediction results. Experimental results on two widely-used datasets demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance. Furthermore, our framework substantially outperforms GPT-4o and other multimodal large language models, showcasing its superior effectiveness in multimodal sentiment analysis. Zhixin Han, Yinhao Bai, Xunzhi Wang, Bitong Luo |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | HCDS: Hierarchical Clustering for Cold-Start Few-Shot Data SelectionabstractDeep learning models usually require large labeled datasets to generalize well, but this is computationally and financially costly. Cold-start few-shot data selection enables fast model generalization by selecting a few diverse, representative samples from an unlabeled data pool. To achieve this goal, previous work usually divides the training data into several clusters and performs sampling from these clusters. Yet, such a way tends to have two issues. First, imbalanced data distribution in the training data pool still exists in the selected subset, causing models' performance biases and suboptimal generalization ability. Second, these methods improve sample diversity in each cluster by considering either the feature dissimilarity among instances, or model uncertainty for individual instance. They ignore the entire representativeness of samples within a cluster. To tackle these challenges, we propose a novel framework HCDS : Hierarchical Clustering for Cold-Start Few-Shot Data Selection. Specifically, we first perform class-level clustering, using pseudo-labels for class supervision and applying contrastive clustering to derive class-rich features. We then refine these features within the class-level clusters into semantically meaningful features and perform representation-level clustering. Finally, we sample data from the representation-level clusters based on global similarity to ensure representativeness. Experimental results on six public datasets, including both balanced and imbalanced ones, show that HCDS achieves state-of-the-art performance, particularly with limited and imbalanced data. Yuhua Zhao 0001, Zhixin Han, Xunzhi Wang, Bitong Luo, Hang Gao 0003, Minlie Huang, Mengting Hu 0002 |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2024 | BvSP: Broad-view Soft Prompting for Few-Shot Aspect Sentiment Quad PredictionabstractYinhao Bai, Yalan Xie, Xiaoyi Liu, Yuhua Zhao, Zhixin Han, Mengting Hu, Hang Gao, Renhong Cheng. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Yinhao Bai, Yalan Xie, Yuhua Zhao 0001, Zhixin Han, Mengting Hu 0002, Hang Gao 0003, Renhong Cheng |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2024 | Towards Robust Information Extraction via Binomial Distribution Guided Counterpart SequenceabstractInformation extraction (IE) aims to extract meaningful structured tuples from unstructured text. Existing studies usually utilize a pre-trained generative language model that rephrases the original sentence into a target sequence, which can be easily decoded as tuples. However, traditional evaluation metrics treat a slight error within the tuple as an entire prediction failure, which is unable to perceive the correctness extent of a tuple. For this reason, we first propose a novel IE evaluation metric called Matching Score to evaluate the correctness of the predicted tuples in more detail. Moreover, previous works have ignored the effects of semantic uncertainty when focusing on the generation of the target sequence. We argue that leveraging the built-in semantic uncertainty of language models is beneficial for improving its robustness. In this work, we propose Binomial distribution guided counterpart sequence (BCS) method, which is a model-agnostic approach. Specifically, we propose to quantify the built-in semantic uncertainty of the language model by bridging all local uncertainties with the whole sequence. Subsequently, with the semantic uncertainty and Matching Score, we formulate a unique binomial distribution for each local decoding step. By sampling from this distribution, a counterpart sequence is obtained, which can be regarded as a semantic complement to the target sequence. Finally, we employ the Kullback-Leibler divergence to align the semantics of the target sequence and its counterpart. Extensive experiments on 14 public datasets over 5 information extraction tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on various methods. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/byinhao/BCS. Yinhao Bai, Yuhua Zhao 0001, Zhixin Han, Hang Gao 0003, Chao Xue 0003, Mengting Hu 0002 |
KDD | 3 |
| 2023 | Scheduling Electric Vehicle Charging for Grid Load BalancingabstractIn recent years, electric vehicles (EVs) have been widely adopted because of their environmental benefits. However, the increasing volume of EVs poses capacity issues for grid operators as simultaneously charging many EVs may result in grid instabilities. Scheduling EV charging for grid load balancing has a potential to prevent load peaks caused by simultaneous EV charging and contribute to balance of supply and demand. This paper proposes a user-preference-based scheduling approach to minimize costs for the user while balancing grid loads. The EV owners benefit by charging when the electricity cost is lower, but still within the user-defined preferred charging periods. On the other hand, the approach reduces the pressure on the grid by balancing the grid load. Two methods, the greedy algorithm and nonlinear programming, are considered along with users' charging preferences and durations. For scheduling small numbers of charging activities, the nonlinear programming model achieves better load balancing than the greedy algorithm; however, for scheduling medium to large numbers of charging activities, the greedy algorithm has a clear advantage in terms of time complexity. Zhixin Han, Katarina Grolinger, Miriam A. M. Capretz, Syed Mir |
IECON | 1 |