In social virtual reality (VR) platforms, players can embody “non-human” avatars, which are representations whose appearance or skeletal structure diverge from typical human characteristics. This capability fosters the emergence of distinctive cultures of social interaction. This paper reports on interviews with users who employ such avatars, investigating (1) motivations for their adoption, (2) their impact on social interactions, and (3) challenges encountered when employing them in social contexts. Our findings reveal that users adopt “non-human” avatars both to escape the expectations and norms associated with the human body—thereby enabling more relaxed social communication—and to gain access to new forms of embodied experience and creative self-expression. The study also provides empirical evidence and discussion on the cultures of social interaction mediated by alternative embodiments, changes in bodily perception resulting from prolonged use, functional and social challenges related to avatar use, and the design strategies and etiquette practices developed to overcome them.

Wearable supernumerary robotic limbs (SRLs) sit at the intersection of human augmentation and embodied AI, promising to function as extensions of the human body. However, their movements within the intimate near-body space raise unresolved challenges for perceived safety, user control, and trust. In this paper, we present results from a Wizard-of-Oz study (n=18), where participants completed near-body collaboration tasks with SRLs to explore these challenges. We collected qualitative data through think-aloud protocols and semi-structured interviews, complemented by physiological signals and post-task ratings. Findings indicate that greater autonomy did not inherently enhance perceived safety or trust. Instead, participants identified near-body zones and paired them with clear coordination rules. They also expressed expectations for how different arm components should behave, shaping preferences around autonomy, perceived safety, and trust. Building on these insights, we introduce SRL Proxemics, a zone- and segment-level design framework showing that autonomy is not monolithic: perceived safety hinges on spatially calibrated, legible behaviors, not on autonomy level alone.

Manipulating a non-humanoid body using a mapping approach that translates human body activity into different structural movements enables users to perform tasks that are difficult with their innate bodies. However, a key challenge is how to design an effective mapping to control non-analogous body parts with the human body. To address this challenge, we designed an articulated virtual arm and investigated the effect of mapping methods on a user’s manipulation experience. Specifically, we developed an unbranched 12-joint virtual arm with an octopus-like appearance. Using this arm, we conducted a user study to compare the effects of several mapping methods with different arrangements on task performance and subjective evaluations of embodiment and user preference. As a result, we identified three important factors in mapping: “Visual and Configurational Similarity”, “Kinematics Suitability for the User”, and “Correspondence with Everyday Actions.” Based on these findings, we discuss a mapping design for non-humanoid body manipulation.