Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michal Spiegel

dblp:361/6491 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 71% Representation and self-supervised learning · 29%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › mathematical reasoning
numerical reasoning
1.922026
Language Models Learn Universal Representations of Numbers and Here's Why You Should Care · ACL (1) 2026
Pre-trained Language Models Learn Remarkably Accurate Representations of Numbers · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › mathematical reasoning › numerical reasoning
number representation
1.012026
Language Models Learn Universal Representations of Numbers and Here's Why You Should Care · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
embedding analysis
0.912025
Pre-trained Language Models Learn Remarkably Accurate Representations of Numbers · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
emergent representations
0.312026
Language Models Learn Universal Representations of Numbers and Here's Why You Should Care · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probing · 1.0sinusoidal embedding analysis · 0.9probing classifier · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Language Models Learn Universal Representations of Numbers and Here's Why You Should Care
abstract
Michal Štefánik, Timothee Mickus, Marek Kadlčík, Bertram Højer, Michal Spiegel, Raúl Vázquez, Aman Sinha, Josef Kuchař, Philipp Mondorf, Pontus Stenetorp. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Michal Stefánik, Timothee Mickus, Marek Kadlcík, Bertram Højer, Michal Spiegel, Raúl Vázquez, Aman Sinha 0002, Josef Kuchar, Philipp Mondorf, Pontus Stenetorp
ACL (1)5
2026 VectorEdits: A Dataset and Benchmark for Instruction-Based Editing of Vector Graphics
abstract
We introduce a large-scale dataset for instruction-guided vector image editing, consisting of over 270,000 pairs of SVG images paired with natural language edit instructions. Our dataset enables training and evaluation of models that modify vector graphics based on textual commands. We describe the data collection process, including image pairing via CLIP similarity and instruction generation with vision-language models. Initial experiments with state-of-the-art large language models reveal that current methods struggle to produce accurate and valid edits, underscoring the challenge of this task. To foster research in natural language-driven vector graphic generation and editing, we make our resources created within this work publicly available.
Josef Kuchar, Marek Kadlcík, Michal Spiegel, Michal Stefánik
LREC3
2025 Pre-trained Language Models Learn Remarkably Accurate Representations of Numbers
abstract
Pretrained language models (LMs) are prone to arithmetic errors.Existing work showed limited success in probing numeric values from models' representations, indicating that these errors can be attributed to the inherent unreliability of distributionally learned embeddings in representing exact quantities.However, we observe that previous probing methods are inadequate for the emergent structure of learned number embeddings with sinusoidal patterns.In response, we propose a novel probing technique that decodes numeric values from input embeddings with near-perfect accuracy across a range of open-source LMs.This proves that after the sole pre-training, LMs represent numbers with remarkable precision.Finally, we find that the embeddings' precision, judged by our probe's accuracy, explains a large portion of LM's errors in elementary arithmetic, and show that aligning the embeddings with the pattern our probes discover can mitigate these errors.
Marek Kadlcík, Michal Stefánik, Timothee Mickus, Josef Kuchar, Michal Spiegel
EMNLP5