Recent AI agents, such as ChatGPT and LLaMA, primarily rely on instruction tuning and reinforcement learning to calibrate the output of large language models (LLMs) with human intentions, ensuring the outputs are harmless and helpful. Existing methods heavily depend on the manual annotation of high-quality positive samples, while contending with issues such as noisy labels and minimal distinctions between preferred and dispreferred response data. However, readily available toxic samples with clear safety distinctions are often filtered out, removing valuable negative references that could aid LLMs in safety alignment. In response, we propose Positive–Toxic Self-Alignment (PT-ALIGN), a novel safety self-alignment approach that minimizes human supervision by automatically refining positive and toxic samples and performing fine-grained dual instruction tuning. Positive samples are harmless responses, while toxic samples deliberately contain extremely harmful content, serving as a new supervisory signal. Specifically, we utilize LLM itself to iteratively generate and refine training instances by only exploring fewer than 50 human annotations. We then employ two losses, i.e., maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and fine-grained unlikelihood training (UT), to jointly learn to enhance the LLM’s safety. The MLE loss encourages an LLM to maximize the generation of harmless content based on positive samples. Conversely, the fine-grained UT loss guides the LLM to minimize the output of harmful words based on toxic samples at the token-level, thereby guiding the model to decouple safety from effectiveness, directing it toward safer fine-tuning objectives, and increasing the likelihood of generating helpful and reliable content. Experiments on 9 popular open-source LLMs demonstrate the effectiveness of our PT-ALIGN for safety alignment, while maintaining comparable levels of helpfulness and usefulness.

The development of Reasoning Large Language Models (RLLMs) has significantly improved multi-step reasoning capabilities, but it has also made hallucination problems more frequent and harder to eliminate. While existing approaches address hallucination through external knowledge integration, model parameter analysis, or self-verification mechanisms, they fail to provide a comprehensive insight into how hallucinations **emerge** and **evolve** throughout the reasoning chain. In this work, we investigate hallucination causality under constrained knowledge domains by auditing the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trajectory and assessing the model's cognitive confidence in potentially erroneous or biased claims. Analysis reveals that in long-CoT settings, RLLMs may iteratively reinforce biases and errors through flawed reflective processes, ultimately inducing hallucinated reasoning paths. Counterintuitively, even with interventions at hallucination origins, reasoning chains display pronounced ''chain disloyalty'', resisting correction and sustaining flawed trajectories. We further point out that existing hallucination detection methods are *less reliable and interpretable than previously assumed*, especially in complex multi-step reasoning contexts. Unlike circuit tracing that requires access to model parameters, our auditing **enables more interpretable long-chain hallucination attribution in black-box settings**, demonstrating stronger generalizability and practical utility. Our code is available at [this link](https://github.com/Winnie-Lian/AHa_Meta_Cognitive).

Neutral atom arrays, particularly the reconfigurable field programmable qubit arrays (FPQA) with atom movement, show strong promise for quantum computing. FPQA has a dynamic qubit connectivity, facilitating cost-effective execution of long-range gates, but it also poses new challenges in the compilation. Inspired by the FPGA compilation strategy, we develop a router, Q-Pilot, that leverages flying ancillas to implement 2-Q gates between data qubits mapped to fixed atoms. Equipped with domain-specific routing techniques, Q-Pilot achieves 1.4×, 27.7×, and 6.7× reductions in circuit depth for 100-qubit random, quantum simulation, and QAOA circuits, respectively, compared to alternative fixed atom array architectures.

The neutral atom array has gained prominence in quantum computing for its scalability and operation fidelity. Previous works focus on fixed atom arrays (FAAs) that require extensive SWAP operations for long-range interactions. This work explores a novel architecture reconfigurable atom arrays (RAAs), also known as field programmable qubit arrays (FPQAs), which allows for coherent atom movements during circuit execution under some constraints. Such atom movements, which are unique to this architecture, could reduce the cost of longrange interactions significantly if the atom movements could be scheduled strategically. In this work, we introduce Atomique, a compilation framework designed for qubit mapping, atom movement, and gate scheduling for RAA. Atomique contains a qubit-array mapper to decide the coarse-grained mapping of the qubits to arrays, leveraging MAX k-Cut on a constructed gate frequency graph to minimize SWAP overhead. Subsequently, a qubit-atom mapper determines the fine-grained mapping of qubits to specific atoms in the array and considers load balance to prevent hardware constraint violations. We further propose a router that identifies parallel gates, schedules them simultaneously, and reduces depth. We evaluate Atomique across 20+ diverse benchmarks, including generic circuits (arbitrary, QASMBench, SupermarQ), quantum simulation, and QAOA circuits. Atomique consistently outperforms IBM Superconducting, FAA with long-range gates, and FAA with rectangular and triangular topologies, achieving significant reductions in depth and the number of two-qubit gates.