EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yunna Cai
dblp:362/0846
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4903-9585ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Learning and educational technologies · 77% Human-AI interaction · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Learning and educational technologies
medical education |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | "I Wouldn't Really Use It as a Practice Tool": Understanding Medical Students' Perspectives and Needs on LLM-Enhanced Clinical Skills Training · CHI 2026 |
Human-AI interaction › human-centered AI
human-centered AI design |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | "I Wouldn't Really Use It as a Practice Tool": Understanding Medical Students' Perspectives and Needs on LLM-Enhanced Clinical Skills Training · CHI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probe-based study · 1.0co-design · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | "I Wouldn't Really Use It as a Practice Tool": Understanding Medical Students' Perspectives and Needs on LLM-Enhanced Clinical Skills TrainingabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) are expected to enhance medical education through personalized clinical skills training. However, their practical application from the student user experience perspective remains underexplored. This gap is critical because without understanding students’ needs, LLM-based tools risk poor adoption and suboptimal learning outcomes. This study explores medical students’ challenges and expectations when using LLM-based clinical skills training through a two-phase investigation involving 14 medical students. We integrated five Type 2 Diabetes cases into a probe platform and conducted probe-based studies followed by co-design workshops. We identified challenges across three categories: dialogue content (lack of realism, insufficient knowledge depth differentiation); dialogue presentation (information overload, single modality limitations); and dialogue interaction (inadequate guidance and feedback). Co-design workshops revealed expectations for enhanced patient modeling, personalized content delivery, structured presentation frameworks, and collaborative features. These findings provide design considerations for developing more effective, user-centered LLM-based medical education systems. Yuru Huang, Yunna Cai, Mingming Fan 0001 |
CHI | 3 |