Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michal Balcerak

dblp:362/2219 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-3137-7048ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network
0.812024
Physics-Regularized Multi-Modal Image Assimilation for Brain Tumor Localization · NeurIPS 2024
Medical and health informatics
radiation therapy planning
0.812024
Physics-Regularized Multi-Modal Image Assimilation for Brain Tumor Localization · NeurIPS 2024
Computer animation and physical simulation
mesh-based simulation
0.812024
Physics-Regularized Multi-Modal Image Assimilation for Brain Tumor Localization · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

partial differential equations · 2.3biomechanical modeling · 2.3physics-informed neural networks · 1.5physics-informed neural network · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Energy Matching: Unifying Flow Matching and Energy-Based Models for Generative Modeling
abstract
Current state-of-the-art generative models map noise to data distributions by matching flows or scores. A key limitation of these models is their inability to readily integrate available partial observations and additional priors. In contrast, energy-based models (EBMs) address this by incorporating corresponding scalar energy terms. Here, we propose Energy Matching, a framework that endows flow-based approaches with the flexibility of EBMs. Far from the data manifold, samples move from noise to data along irrotational, optimal transport paths. As they approach the data manifold, an entropic energy term guides the system into a Boltzmann equilibrium distribution, explicitly capturing the underlying likelihood structure of the data. We parameterize these dynamics with a single time-independent scalar field, which serves as both a powerful generator and a flexible prior for effective regularization of inverse problems. The present method substantially outperforms existing EBMs on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet generation in terms of fidelity, while retaining simulation-free training of transport-based approaches away from the data manifold. Furthermore, we leverage the flexibility of the method to introduce an interaction energy that supports the exploration of diverse modes, which we demonstrate in a controlled protein generation setting. This approach learns a scalar potential energy, without time conditioning, auxiliary generators, or additional networks, marking a significant departure from recent EBM methods. We believe this simplified yet rigorous formulation significantly advances EBMs capabilities and paves the way for their wider adoption in generative modeling in diverse domains.
Michal Balcerak, Tamaz Amiranashvili, Antonio Terpin, Suprosanna Shit, Lea Bogensperger, Sebastian Kaltenbach, Petros Koumoutsakos, Bjoern Menze
NeurIPS1
2025 Personalized predictions of Glioblastoma infiltration: Mathematical models, Physics-Informed Neural Networks and multimodal scans
Ray Zirui Zhang, Ivan Ezhov, Michal Balcerak, Andy Zhu, Benedikt Wiestler, Bjoern Menze, John S. Lowengrub
Medical Image Anal.3
2025 A Learnable Prior Improves Inverse Tumor Growth Modeling
abstract
Biophysical modeling, particularly involving partial differential equations (PDEs), offers significant potential for tailoring disease treatment protocols to individual patients. However, the inverse problem-solving aspect of these models presents a substantial challenge, either due to the high computational requirements of model-based approaches or the limited robustness of deep learning (DL) methods. We propose a novel framework that leverages the unique strengths of both approaches in a synergistic manner. Our method incorporates a DL ensemble for initial parameter estimation, facilitating efficient downstream evolutionary sampling initialized with this DL-based prior. We showcase the effectiveness of integrating a rapid deep-learning algorithm with a high-precision evolution strategy in estimating brain tumor cell concentrations from magnetic resonance images. The DL-Prior plays a pivotal role, significantly constraining the effective sampling-parameter space. This reduction results in a fivefold convergence acceleration and a Dice-score of 95%.
Jonas Weidner, Ivan Ezhov, Michal Balcerak, Marie Metz, Sergey Litvinov, Sebastian Kaltenbach, Leonhard F. Feiner, Laurin Lux, Florian Kofler, Jana Lipková, Jonas Latz, Daniel Rueckert, Bjoern Menze, Benedikt Wiestler
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging3
2024 Physics-Regularized Multi-Modal Image Assimilation for Brain Tumor Localization
abstract
Physical models in the form of partial differential equations serve as important priors for many under-constrained problems. One such application is tumor treatment planning, which relies on accurately estimating the spatial distribution of tumor cells within a patient’s anatomy. While medical imaging can detect the bulk of a tumor, it cannot capture the full extent of its spread, as low-concentration tumor cells often remain undetectable, particularly in glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor. Machine learning approaches struggle to estimate the complete tumor cell distribution due to a lack of appropriate training data. Consequently, most existing methods rely on physics-based simulations to generate anatomically and physiologically plausible estimations. However, these approaches face challenges with complex and unknown initial conditions and are constrained by overly rigid physical models. In this work, we introduce a novel method that integrates data-driven and physics-based cost functions, akin to Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). However, our approach parametrizes the solution directly on a dynamic discrete mesh, allowing for the effective modeling of complex biomechanical behaviors. Specifically, we propose a unique discretization scheme that quantifies how well the learned spatiotemporal distributions of tumor and brain tissues adhere to their respective growth and elasticity equations. This quantification acts as a regularization term, offering greater flexibility and improved integration of patient data compared to existing models. We demonstrate enhanced coverage of tumor recurrence areas using real-world data from a patient cohort, highlighting the potential of our method to improve model-driven treatment planning for glioblastoma in clinical practice.
Michal Balcerak, Tamaz Amiranashvili, Jonas Weidner, Petr Karnakov, Johannes C. Paetzold, Ivan Ezhov, Petros Koumoutsakos, Benedikt Wiestler, Bjoern Menze
NeurIPS1