Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mete Inan
dblp:362/2328 · also Mete Cihad Inan
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-4350-1480ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Empirical software engineering · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution › issue management
issue triaging |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Issue Report Validation in an Industrial Context · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2023 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Issue Report Validation in an Industrial Context · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
morphological analysis · 0.7machine learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Improving the quality of software issue report descriptions in Turkish: An industrial case study at Softtech
Ethem Utku Aktas, Ebru Cakmak, Mete Inan, Cemal Yilmaz 0001 |
Empir. Softw. Eng. | 3 |
| 2023 | Issue Report Validation in an Industrial ContextabstractEffective issue triaging is crucial for software development teams to improve software quality, and thus customer satisfaction. Validating issue reports manually can be time-consuming, hindering the overall efficiency of the triaging process. This paper presents an approach on automating the validation of issue reports to accelerate the issue triaging process in an industrial set-up. We work on 1,200 randomly selected issue reports in banking domain, written in Turkish, an agglutinative language, meaning that new words can be formed with linear concatenation of suffixes to express entire sentences. We manually label these reports for validity, and extract the relevant patterns indicating that they are invalid. Since the issue reports we work on are written in an agglutinative language, we use morphological analysis to extract the features. Using the proposed feature extractors, we utilize a machine learning based approach to predict the issue reports’ validity, performing a 0.77 F1-score. Ethem Utku Aktas, Ebru Cakmak, Mete Inan, Cemal Yilmaz 0001 |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 3 |