Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shpresim Sadiku

dblp:362/3054 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Image recognition and object detection · 13%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial examples
0.912025
GSE: Group-wise Sparse and Explainable Adversarial Attacks · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
GSE: Group-wise Sparse and Explainable Adversarial Attacks · ICLR 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
0.912025
GSE: Group-wise Sparse and Explainable Adversarial Attacks · ICLR 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › adversarial example generation
sparse adversarial attack
0.912025
GSE: Group-wise Sparse and Explainable Adversarial Attacks · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.312025
GSE: Group-wise Sparse and Explainable Adversarial Attacks · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quasinorm proximal operator · 1.7nesterov accelerated gradient descent · 1.7group sparsity · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 S-CFE: Simple Counterfactual Explanations
abstract
We study the problem of finding optimal sparse, manifold-aligned counterfactual explanations for classifiers. Canonically, this can be formulated as an optimization problem with multiple non-convex components, including classifier loss functions and manifold alignment (or \emph{plausibility}) metrics. The added complexity of enforcing \emph{sparsity}, or shorter explanations, complicates the problem further. Existing methods often focus on specific models and plausibility measures, relying on convex $\ell_1$ regularizers to enforce sparsity. In this paper, we tackle the canonical formulation using the accelerated proximal gradient (APG) method, a simple yet efficient first-order procedure capable of handling smooth non-convex objectives and non-smooth $\ell_p$ (where $0 \leq p < 1$) regularizers. This enables our approach to seamlessly incorporate various classifiers and plausibility measures while producing sparser solutions. Our algorithm only requires differentiable data-manifold regularizers and supports box constraints for bounded feature ranges, ensuring the generated counterfactuals remain \emph{actionable}. Finally, experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach effectively produces sparse, manifold-aligned counterfactual explanations while maintaining proximity to the factual data and computational efficiency.
Shpresim Sadiku, Moritz Wagner 0002, Sai Ganesh Nagarajan, Sebastian Pokutta
AISTATS1
2025 GSE: Group-wise Sparse and Explainable Adversarial Attacks
abstract
Sparse adversarial attacks fool deep neural networks (DNNs) through minimal pixel perturbations, often regularized by the $\ell_0$ norm. Recent efforts have replaced this norm with a structural sparsity regularizer, such as the nuclear group norm, to craft group-wise sparse adversarial attacks. The resulting perturbations are thus explainable and hold significant practical relevance, shedding light on an even greater vulnerability of DNNs. However, crafting such attacks poses an optimization challenge, as it involves computing norms for groups of pixels within a non-convex objective. We address this by presenting a two-phase algorithm that generates group-wise sparse attacks within semantically meaningful areas of an image. Initially, we optimize a quasinorm adversarial loss using the $1/2$-quasinorm proximal operator tailored for non-convex programming. Subsequently, the algorithm transitions to a projected Nesterov's accelerated gradient descent with $2$-norm regularization applied to perturbation magnitudes. Rigorous evaluations on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets demonstrate a remarkable increase in group-wise sparsity, e.g., $50.9\%$ on CIFAR-10 and $38.4\%$ on ImageNet (average case, targeted attack). This performance improvement is accompanied by significantly faster computation times, improved interpretability, and a $100\%$ attack success rate.
Shpresim Sadiku, Moritz Wagner 0002, Sebastian Pokutta
ICLR1