Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Svetoslav Nizhnichenkov

dblp:362/5921 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation
0.812024
Interactive Human-Centric Bias Mitigation · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.812024
Interactive Human-Centric Bias Mitigation · AAAI 2024
Human-AI interaction › responsible AI
bias reduction
0.812024
Interactive Human-Centric Bias Mitigation · AAAI 2024
Visualization and visual analytics › human-in-the-loop
interactive machine learning
0.212024
Interactive Human-Centric Bias Mitigation · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

crowdsourcing · 2.3bias mitigation algorithms · 2.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Interactive Human-Centric Bias Mitigation
abstract
Bias mitigation algorithms differ in their definition of bias and how they go about achieving that objective. Bias mitigation algorithms impact different cohorts differently and allowing end users and data scientists to understand the impact of these differences in order to make informed choices is a relatively unexplored domain. This demonstration presents an interactive bias mitigation pipeline that allows users to understand the cohorts impacted by their algorithm choice and provide feedback in order to provide a bias mitigated pipeline that most aligns with their goals.
Inge Vejsbjerg, Elizabeth Daly, Rahul Nair 0004, Svetoslav Nizhnichenkov
AAAI4