EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Miaozeng Du
dblp:362/8074
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 19% Segmentation and scene understanding · 18% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | Forget What Has Seen: Selective Concept Unlearning in Segmentation Foundation Models · AAAI 2026 Single Image Unlearning: Efficient Machine Unlearning in Multimodal Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › machine unlearning
concept unlearning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Forget What Has Seen: Selective Concept Unlearning in Segmentation Foundation Models · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
foundation model segmentation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Forget What Has Seen: Selective Concept Unlearning in Segmentation Foundation Models · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Single Image Unlearning: Efficient Machine Unlearning in Multimodal Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › machine unlearning
multimodal large language model unlearning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Single Image Unlearning: Efficient Machine Unlearning in Multimodal Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
event extraction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Three Stream Based Multi-level Event Contrastive Learning for Text-Video Event Extraction · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event extraction
multimodal event extraction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Three Stream Based Multi-level Event Contrastive Learning for Text-Video Event Extraction · EMNLP 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Forget What Has Seen: Selective Concept Unlearning in Segmentation Foundation Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Three Stream Based Multi-level Event Contrastive Learning for Text-Video Event Extraction · EMNLP 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knowledge distillation · 1.0attention suppression · 1.0fine-tuning · 0.8dual masked KL-divergence loss · 0.8cross-entropy loss · 0.8optical flow · 0.7dual querying · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Forget What Has Seen: Selective Concept Unlearning in Segmentation Foundation ModelsabstractMachine unlearning (MU) has emerged as a critical tool for removing sensitive or personal information from machine learning models, empowering individuals with the right to be forgotten. While MU has achieved success in classification and generative tasks, whether this technique can be effectively applied to segmentation foundation models remains uncertain. To address this issue, we propose an efficient method, Selective Concept Unlearning (SCU), to unlearn the segmentation capability of target concepts. SCU consists of several key aspects: (1) The Multi-level Forgetting Module, designed with a hierarchical three-level suppression strategy, including (i) distillation-level: Negative distillation steers model’s output distribution away from teacher’s correct outputs, erasing its learned concept recognition. (ii) attention-level: Attention suppression minimizes model’s attention to target regions. (iii) output-level: Directly erases predictions for the target by relabeling as background. (2) The Preservation Module ensures maintaining segmentation quality for non-target concepts. Additionally, we introduce a set of metrics to evaluate segmentation unlearning methods. Experiments demonstrate that SCU consistently outperforms existing baselines. Miaozeng Du, Jiaqi Li 0031, Sirui Pan, Guilin Qi, Rihui Jin, Yinjia Shu, Qianshan Wei |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Single Image Unlearning: Efficient Machine Unlearning in Multimodal Large Language ModelsabstractMachine unlearning (MU) empowers individuals with the `right to be forgotten' by removing their private or sensitive information encoded in machine learning models. However, it remains uncertain whether MU can be effectively applied to Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), particularly in scenarios of forgetting the leaked visual data of concepts. To overcome the challenge, we propose an efficient method, Single Image Unlearning (SIU), to unlearn the visual recognition of a concept by fine-tuning a single associated image for few steps. SIU consists of two key aspects: (i) Constructing Multifaceted fine-tuning data. We introduce four targets, based on which we construct fine-tuning data for the concepts to be forgotten; (ii) Joint training loss. To synchronously forget the visual recognition of concepts and preserve the utility of MLLMs, we fine-tune MLLMs through a novel Dual Masked KL-divergence Loss combined with Cross Entropy loss. Alongside our method, we establish MMUBench, a new benchmark for MU in MLLMs and introduce a collection of metrics for its evaluation. Experimental results on MMUBench show that SIU completely surpasses the performance of existing methods. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that SIU can avoid invasive membership inference attacks and jailbreak attacks. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to explore MU in MLLMs. We will release the code and benchmark in the near future. Jiaqi Li 0031, Qianshan Wei, Chuanyi Zhang, Guilin Qi, Miaozeng Du, Yongrui Chen 0002, Fan Liu 0003 |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2023 | Three Stream Based Multi-level Event Contrastive Learning for Text-Video Event ExtractionabstractText-video based multimodal event extraction refers to identifying event information from the given text-video pairs.Existing methods predominantly utilize video appearance features (VAF) and text sequence features (TSF) as input information.Some of them employ contrastive learning to align VAF with the event types extracted from TSF.However, they disregard the motion representations in videos and the optimization of contrastive objective could be misguided by the background noise from RGB frames.We observe that the same event triggers correspond to similar motion trajectories, which are hardly affected by the background noise.motivated by this, we propose a Three Stream Multimodal Event Extraction framework (TSEE) that simultaneously utilizes the features of text sequence and video appearance, as well as the motion representations to enhance the event extraction capacity.Firstly, we extract the optical flow features (OFF) as motion representations from videos to incorporate with VAF and TSF.Then we introduce a Multi-level Event Contrastive Learning module to align the embedding space between OFF and event triggers, as well as between event triggers and types.Finally, a Dual Querying Text module is proposed to enhance the interaction between modalities.Experimental results show that TSEE outperforms the state-of-theart methods, which demonstrates its superiority. Jiaqi Li 0031, Chuanyi Zhang, Miaozeng Du, Dehai Min, Yongrui Chen 0002, Guilin Qi |
EMNLP | 3 |