Machine unlearning (MU) has emerged as a critical tool for removing sensitive or personal information from machine learning models, empowering individuals with the right to be forgotten. While MU has achieved success in classification and generative tasks, whether this technique can be effectively applied to segmentation foundation models remains uncertain. To address this issue, we propose an efficient method, Selective Concept Unlearning (SCU), to unlearn the segmentation capability of target concepts. SCU consists of several key aspects: (1) The Multi-level Forgetting Module, designed with a hierarchical three-level suppression strategy, including (i) distillation-level: Negative distillation steers model’s output distribution away from teacher’s correct outputs, erasing its learned concept recognition. (ii) attention-level: Attention suppression minimizes model’s attention to target regions. (iii) output-level: Directly erases predictions for the target by relabeling as background. (2) The Preservation Module ensures maintaining segmentation quality for non-target concepts. Additionally, we introduce a set of metrics to evaluate segmentation unlearning methods. Experiments demonstrate that SCU consistently outperforms existing baselines.

Table Retrieval (TR) has traditionally been formulated as an ad-hoc retrieval problem, where relevance is primarily determined by topical semantic similarity. With the growing adoption of LLM-based agentic systems, access to structured data is increasingly instruction-driven, where relevance is conditional on explicit content and schema constraints rather than topical similarity alone. We therefore formalize Instruction-Following Table Retrieval (IFTR), a new task that requires models to jointly satisfy topical relevance and fine-grained instruction constraints. We identify two core challenges in IFTR: (i) sensitivity to content scope, such as inclusion and exclusion constraints, and (ii) awareness of schema-grounded requirements, including column semantics and representation granularity--capabilities largely absent in existing retrievers. To support systematic evaluation, we introduce FollowTable, the first large-scale benchmark for IFTR, constructed via a taxonomy-driven annotation pipeline. We further propose a new metric, termed the Instruction Responsiveness Score, to evaluate whether retrieval rankings consistently adapt to user instructions relative to a topic-only baseline. Our results indicate that existing retrieval models struggle to follow fine-grained instructions over tabular data. In particular, they exhibit systematic biases toward surface-level semantic cues and remain limited in handling schema-grounded constraints, highlighting substantial room for future improvements.

Table Understanding (TU) has achieved promising advancements, but it faces the challenges of the scarcity of manually labeled tables and the presence of complex table structures. To address these challenges, we propose HeGTa, a heterogeneous graph (HG)-enhanced large language model (LLM) designed for few-shot TU tasks. This framework aligns structural table semantics with the LLM's parametric knowledge through soft prompts and instruction tuning. It also addresses complex tables with a multi-task pre-training scheme, incorporating three novel multi-granularity self-supervised HG pre-text tasks. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of HeGTa, showing that it outperforms the SOTA for few-shot complex TU on several benchmarks.