Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anubhooti Jain

dblp:363/7496 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 63% Vision and language · 37%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
cross-modal alignment
0.912025
Words Over Pixels? Rethinking Vision in Multimodal Large Language Models · IJCAI 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
Words Over Pixels? Rethinking Vision in Multimodal Large Language Models · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
visual explanation
0.912025
Words Over Pixels? Rethinking Vision in Multimodal Large Language Models · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness and bias
0.812024
Adventures of Trustworthy Vision-Language Models: A Survey · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
Adventures of Trustworthy Vision-Language Models: A Survey · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
Adventures of Trustworthy Vision-Language Models: A Survey · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › social bias
social bias in vision-language models
0.812024
Adventures of Trustworthy Vision-Language Models: A Survey · AAAI 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model interpretability
0.812024
Adventures of Trustworthy Vision-Language Models: A Survey · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › multimodal robustness
vision-language model robustness
0.812024
Adventures of Trustworthy Vision-Language Models: A Survey · AAAI 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › vision-language model architecture
vision-language transformer
0.212024
Adventures of Trustworthy Vision-Language Models: A Survey · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 HumanBench: Two Heads, No Legs, But Mostly Human, the State of Generative Capabilities in T2I Models
abstract
Despite rapid advances, text-to-image (T2I) models still struggle to generate anatomically coherent and semantically grounded humans. We present HumanBench, a large-scale benchmark of 36K images designed to evaluate T2I models across four axes: template consistency, spatial reasoning, action understanding, and texture recognition. To quantify alignment, we propose two metrics—Agreement and Distinction—that capture both fidelity to prompts and separation from counterfactual or negated variants. HumanBench introduces a formal measure of prompt complexity based on slot counts and compositional bindings, enabling controlled analysis of model performance. Evaluating three publicly accessible models (Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, FLUX) comprehensively and three additional models on a subset, we find persistent failures, including disfigurements, species leakage, and counting errors. Prompt–image consistency declines monotonically with complexity, a trend observed across the models. A human study of 300 samples further corroborates these findings, showing a strong correlation between Agreement scores and human ratings. By unifying automated metrics, controlled prompt design, and human validation, HumanBench provides a robust foundation for auditing the compositional and anatomical capabilities of modern T2I models. Dataset is available here.
Anubhooti Jain, Mayank Vatsa, Richa Singh 0001
WACV1
2025 Words Over Pixels? Rethinking Vision in Multimodal Large Language Models
abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) promise seamless integration of vision and language understanding. However, despite their strong performance, recent studies reveal that MLLMs often fail to effectively utilize visual information, frequently relying on textual cues instead. This survey provides a comprehensive analysis of the vision component in MLLMs, covering both application-level and architectural aspects. We investigate critical challenges such as weak spatial reasoning, poor fine-grained visual perception, and suboptimal fusion of visual and textual modalities. Additionally, we explore limitations in current vision encoders, benchmark inconsistencies, and their implications for downstream tasks. By synthesizing recent advancements, we highlight key research opportunities to enhance visual understanding, improve cross-modal alignment, and develop more robust and efficient MLLMs. Our observations emphasize the urgent need to elevate vision to an equal footing with language, paving the path for more reliable and perceptually aware multimodal models.
Anubhooti Jain, Mayank Vatsa, Richa Singh 0001
IJCAI1
2024 Adventures of Trustworthy Vision-Language Models: A Survey
abstract
Recently, transformers have become incredibly popular in computer vision and vision-language tasks. This notable rise in their usage can be primarily attributed to the capabilities offered by attention mechanisms and the outstanding ability of transformers to adapt and apply themselves to a variety of tasks and domains. Their versatility and state-of-the-art performance have established them as indispensable tools for a wide array of applications. However, in the constantly changing landscape of machine learning, the assurance of the trustworthiness of transformers holds utmost importance. This paper conducts a thorough examination of vision-language transformers, employing three fundamental principles of responsible AI: Bias, Robustness, and Interpretability. The primary objective of this paper is to delve into the intricacies and complexities associated with the practical use of transformers, with the overarching goal of advancing our comprehension of how to enhance their reliability and accountability.
Mayank Vatsa, Anubhooti Jain, Richa Singh 0001
AAAI2
2024 Discerning the Chaos: Detecting Adversarial Perturbations while Disentangling Intentional from Unintentional Noises
abstract
Deep learning models, such as those used for face recognition and attribute prediction, are susceptible to manipulations like adversarial noise and unintentional noise, including Gaussian and impulse noise. This paper introduces CIAI, a Class-Independent Adversarial Intent detection network built on a modified vision transformer with detection layers. CIAI employs a novel loss function that combines Maximum Mean Discrepancy and Center Loss to detect both intentional (adversarial attacks) and unintentional noise, regardless of the image class. It is trained in a multistep fashion. We also introduce the aspect of intent during detection that can act as an added layer of security. We further showcase the performance of our proposed detector on CelebA, CelebA-HQ, LFW, AgeDB, and CIFAR-10 datasets. Our detector is able to detect both intentional (like FGSM, PGD, and DeepFool) and unintentional (like Gaussian and Salt & Pepper noises) perturbations.
Anubhooti Jain, Susim Mukul Roy, Kwanit Gupta, Mayank Vatsa, Richa Singh 0001
IJCB1