Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qiaoyuan Yang

dblp:363/9353 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-8024-8411ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 80% Approximation and online algorithms · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Graph data management · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
clustering approximation
1.722025
Faster Approximation Algorithms for k-Center via Data Reduction · ICML 2025
Fair Clustering in the Sliding Window Model · ICLR 2025
Algorithms and data structures
clustering
0.912025
Fair Clustering in the Sliding Window Model · ICLR 2025
Algorithms and data structures › data summarization › coresets
coreset construction
0.912025
Faster Approximation Algorithms for k-Center via Data Reduction · ICML 2025
Algorithms and data structures › parameterized algorithms
data reduction
0.912025
Faster Approximation Algorithms for k-Center via Data Reduction · ICML 2025
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
euclidean clustering
0.912025
Faster Approximation Algorithms for k-Center via Data Reduction · ICML 2025
Algorithms and data structures › clustering › constrained clustering
fair clustering
0.912025
Fair Clustering in the Sliding Window Model · ICLR 2025
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
k-center clustering
0.912025
Faster Approximation Algorithms for k-Center via Data Reduction · ICML 2025
Algorithms and data structures › data streams › streaming algorithms
sliding window model
0.912025
Fair Clustering in the Sliding Window Model · ICLR 2025
Algorithms and data structures › data streams
streaming algorithms
0.912025
Fair Clustering in the Sliding Window Model · ICLR 2025
Graph data management › cohesive subgraph mining › core decomposition
bipartite core
0.712023
Efficient Core Maintenance in Large Bipartite Graphs · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Graph data management
cohesive subgraph mining
0.712023
Efficient Core Maintenance in Large Bipartite Graphs · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Graph data management › dynamic graph maintenance
core maintenance
0.712023
Efficient Core Maintenance in Large Bipartite Graphs · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Graph data management
dynamic graph
0.712023
Efficient Core Maintenance in Large Bipartite Graphs · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sliding window streaming · 0.9coreset construction · 0.9consistent hashing · 0.9approximation algorithm · 0.9bi-core number analysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Fair Clustering in the Sliding Window Model
abstract
We study streaming algorithms for proportionally fair clustering, a notion originally suggested by Chierichetti et al. (2017), in the sliding window model. We show that although there exist efficient streaming algorithms in the insertion-only model, surprisingly no algorithm can achieve finite ratio without violating the fairness constraint in sliding window. Hence, the problem of fair clustering is a rare separation between the insertion-only streaming model and the sliding window model. On the other hand, we show that if the fairness constraint is relaxed by a multiplicative $(1+\varepsilon)$ factor, there exists a $(1 + \varepsilon)$-approximate sliding window algorithm that uses $\text{poly}(k\varepsilon^{-1}\log n)$ space. This achieves essentially the best parameters (up to degree in the polynomial) provided the aforementioned lower bound. We also implement a number of empirical evaluations on real datasets to complement our theoretical results.
Vincent Cohen-Addad, Shaofeng H.-C. Jiang, Qiaoyuan Yang, Samson Zhou
ICLR3
2025 Faster Approximation Algorithms for k-Center via Data Reduction
abstract
We study efficient algorithms for the Euclidean $k$-Center problem, focusing on the regime of large $k$. We take the approach of data reduction by considering $\alpha$-coreset, which is a small subset $S$ of the dataset $P$ such that any $\beta$-approximation on $S$ is an $(\alpha + \beta)$-approximation on $P$. We give efficient algorithms to construct coresets whose size is $k \cdot o(n)$, which immediately speeds up existing approximation algorithms. Notably, we obtain a near-linear time $O(1)$-approximation when $k = n^c$ for any $0 < c < 1$. We validate the performance of our coresets on real-world datasets with large $k$, and we observe that the coreset speeds up the well-known Gonzalez algorithm by up to $4$ times, while still achieving similar clustering cost. Technically, one of our coreset results is based on a new efficient construction of consistent hashing with competitive parameters. This general tool may be of independent interest for algorithm design in high dimensional Euclidean spaces.
Arnold Filtser, Shaofeng H.-C. Jiang, Yi Li 0002, Anurag Murty Naredla, Ioannis Psarros, Qiaoyuan Yang, Qin Zhang 0001
ICML6
2025 Fully Dynamic Algorithms for Chamfer Distance
abstract
We study the problem of computing Chamfer distance in the fully dynamic setting, where two sets of points $A, B \subset \mathbb{R}^{d}$, each of size up to $n$, dynamically evolve through point insertions or deletions and the goal is to efficiently maintain an approximation to $dist_{\mathrm{CH}}(A,B) = \sum_{a \in A} \min_{b \in B} dist(a,b)$, where $dist$ is a distance measure. Chamfer distance is a widely used dissimilarity metric for point clouds, with many practical applications that require repeated evaluation on dynamically changing datasets, e.g., when used as a loss function in machine learning. In this paper, we present the first dynamic algorithm for maintaining an approximation of the Chamfer distance under the $\ell_p$ norm for $p \in$ {$1,2$}. Our algorithm reduces to approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search with little overhead. Plugging in standard ANN bounds, we obtain $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation in $\tilde{O}(\epsilon^{-d})$ update time and $O(1/\epsilon)$-approximation in $\tilde{O}(d n^{\epsilon^2} \epsilon^{-4})$ update time. We evaluate our method on real-world datasets and demonstrate that it performs competitively against natural baselines.
Gramoz Goranci, Shaofeng H.-C. Jiang, Peter Kiss, Eva Szilagyi, Qiaoyuan Yang
NeurIPS5
2023 Efficient Core Maintenance in Large Bipartite Graphs
abstract
As an important cohesive subgraph model in bipartite graphs, the (α, β)-core (a.k.a. bi-core) has found a wide spectrum of real-world applications, such as product recommendation, fraudster detection, and community search. In these applications, the bipartite graphs are often large and dynamic, where vertices and edges are inserted and deleted frequently, so it is costly to recompute (α, β)-cores from scratch when the graph has changed. Recently, a few works have attempted to study how to maintain (α, β)-cores in the dynamic bipartite graph, but their performance is still far from perfect, due to the huge size of graphs and their frequent changes. To alleviate this issue, in this paper we present efficient (α, β)-core maintenance algorithms over bipartite graphs. We first introduce a novel concept, called bi-core numbers, for the vertices of bipartite graphs. Based on this concept, we theoretically analyze the effect of inserting and deleting edges on the changes of vertices' bi-core numbers, which can be further used to narrow down the scope of the updates, thereby reducing the computational redundancy. We then propose efficient (α, β)-core maintenance algorithms for handling the edge insertion and edge deletion respectively, by exploiting the above theoretical analysis results. Finally, extensive experimental evaluations are performed on both real and synthetic datasets, and the results show that our proposed algorithms are up to two orders of magnitude faster than the state-of-the-art approaches.
Wensheng Luo 0002, Qiaoyuan Yang, Yixiang Fang, Xu Zhou 0001
Proc. ACM Manag. Data2