Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rasmus S. Lunding

dblp:364/0440 · also Rasmus Skovhus Lunding · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2742-057XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Human-robot interaction · 37% User interface design and tools · 32% Immersive interaction · 31%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
human-robot collaboration
1.122025
Investigating AR Assistance for Human-Robot Collaboration in Mould Assembly "in the Wild" · HRI 2025
RoboVisAR: Immersive Authoring of Condition-based AR Robot Visualisations · HRI 2024
User interface design and tools › user interface design
AR interface design
0.912025
Investigating AR Assistance for Human-Robot Collaboration in Mould Assembly "in the Wild" · HRI 2025
User interface design and tools
authoring tools
0.912025
Investigating AR Assistance for Human-Robot Collaboration in Mould Assembly "in the Wild" · HRI 2025
Immersive interaction
augmented reality
0.812024
RoboVisAR: Immersive Authoring of Condition-based AR Robot Visualisations · HRI 2024
Immersive interaction
immersive authoring
0.812024
RoboVisAR: Immersive Authoring of Condition-based AR Robot Visualisations · HRI 2024
Human-robot interaction
industrial assembly
0.312025
Investigating AR Assistance for Human-Robot Collaboration in Mould Assembly "in the Wild" · HRI 2025
Immersive interaction
augmented reality interaction
0.212023
AR-supported Human-Robot Collaboration: Facilitating Workspace Awareness and Parallelized Assembly Tasks · ISMAR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

field study · 0.9mixed reality · 0.8expert user study · 0.8user study · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Investigating AR Assistance for Human-Robot Collaboration in Mould Assembly "in the Wild"
abstract
Augmented reality shows great promise for supporting human-robot collaboration. However, investigating this “in the wild” with participants from industry is mostly uncharted territory. Addressing this, we report on a field study evaluation of ARTHUR, an open-source authoring tool for augmented reality-assisted human-robot collaboration. To facilitate this domain-specific study, we extended ARTHUR with additional design components, improved the authoring experience, and support for collaborative authoring. The study took place at a local company, with 16 participants from three stakeholder groups: robot engineers, UX designers, and operators. The task was to assemble and disassemble a subset of an injection mould together with a collaborative robot, while supported by an AR-interface created in ARTHUR. The study revealed a strong desire of operators to be assisted in their daily tasks by robot(s) that serve as an extra (strong) set of hands, and augmented reality to guide the process and communicate robot intent. Engineers confirmed the feasibility of integrating ARTHUR in future semi-automated workflows and UX designers appreciated the authoring capabilities and proposed further features.
Rasmus S. Lunding, Tiare M. Feuchtner, Kaj Grønbæk
HRI1
2024 RoboVisAR: Immersive Authoring of Condition-based AR Robot Visualisations
abstract
We introduce RoboVisAR, an immersive augmented reality (AR) authoring tool for in-situ robot visualisations. AR robot visualisations, such as the robot's movement path, status, and safety zones, have been shown to benefit human-robot collaboration. However, their creation requires extensive skills in both robotics and AR programming. To address this, RoboVisAR allows users to create custom AR robot visualisations without programming. By recording an example robot behaviour, users can design, combine, and test visualisations in-situ within a mixed reality environment. RoboVisAR currently supports six types of visualisations (Path, Point of Interest, Safety Zone, Robot State, Message, Force/Torque) and four types of conditions for when they are displayed (Robot State, Proximity, Box, Force/Torque). With this tool, users can easily present different visualisations on demand and make them context-aware to avoid visual clutter. An expert user study with three participants suggests that users appreciate the customizability of the visualisations, which could easily be authored in less than ten minutes.
Rasmus S. Lunding, Mille Skovhus Lunding, Tiare M. Feuchtner, Marianne Graves Petersen, Kaj Grønbæk, Ryo Suzuki 0001
HRI1
2023 AR-supported Human-Robot Collaboration: Facilitating Workspace Awareness and Parallelized Assembly Tasks
abstract
While technologies for human-robot collaboration are rapidly advancing, plenty of aspects still need further investigation, such as ensuring workspace awareness, enabling the operator to reschedule tasks on the fly, and how users prefer to coordinate and collaborate with robots. To address these, we propose an Augmented Reality interface that supports human-robot collaboration in an assembly task by (1) enabling the inspection of planned and ongoing robot processes through dynamic task lists and a path visualization, (2) allowing the operator to also delegate tasks to the robot, and (3) presenting step-by-step assembly instructions. We evaluate our AR interface in comparison to a state-of-the-art tablet interface in a user study, where participants collaborated with a robot arm in a shared workspace to complete an assembly task. Our findings confirm the feasibility and potential of AR-assisted human-robot collaboration, while pointing to some central challenges that require further work.
Rasmus S. Lunding, Mathias N. Lystbæk, Tiare M. Feuchtner, Kaj Grønbæk
ISMAR1