EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arthur Da Costa Vangasse
dblp:364/1645 · also Arthur Da C. Vangasse, Arthur Vangasse
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-1758-5635ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 62% Legged, aerial and field robots · 38% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Virtual and augmented reality · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › path planning
collision-free path planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deliberative Control-Aware Motion Planning for Kinematic-Constrained UAVs in a Dynamic Environment · ICRA 2025 |
Virtual and augmented reality
mixed reality |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Accurate is the Hololens 2? a Robotic Ground-Truth and Sensor Occlusion Evaluation · ISMAR 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Accurate is the Hololens 2? a Robotic Ground-Truth and Sensor Occlusion Evaluation · ISMAR 2025 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Deliberative Control-Aware Motion Planning for Kinematic-Constrained UAVs in a Dynamic Environment · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
UAV navigation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Deliberative Control-Aware Motion Planning for Kinematic-Constrained UAVs in a Dynamic Environment · ICRA 2025 |
Wearable and physiological sensing
sensor fusion |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | How Accurate is the Hololens 2? a Robotic Ground-Truth and Sensor Occlusion Evaluation · ISMAR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sensor occlusion · 2.6robotic ground truth · 2.6velocity obstacle · 0.9differential evolution · 0.9NURBS · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Deliberative Control-Aware Motion Planning for Kinematic-Constrained UAVs in a Dynamic EnvironmentabstractThis paper introduces a motion planning approach for navigating in a dynamic environment. The path is represented using a Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS) to ensure smoothness, curvature continuity, and proper orientation by adjusting its parameters. A Differential Evolution algorithm optimizes the curve parameters and traversal speed at each replanning interval, taking into account speed limits, maximum curvature, and obstacles in the environment. A constraintbased on Velocity Obstacle (VO) ensures collision-free motion, considering bounds provided by lower-level controllers. The feasibility of the approach is validated through simulations and real-world experiments with the Crazyflie 2.1 micro quadcopter. Elias José De Rezende Freitas, Arthur Da Costa Vangasse, Miri Weiss-Cohen, Frederico G. Guimarães, Luciano C. A. Pimenta |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2025 | How Accurate is the Hololens 2? a Robotic Ground-Truth and Sensor Occlusion EvaluationabstractSpatial tracking in Mixed Reality (MR) relies on the device's sensor fusion and localization accuracy, directly impacting virtual object placement and user interaction. In this paper, we measure the minimum achievable projection error of Microsoft's HL2 with an industrial-grade robotic manipulator as ground truth. Specifically, we use a reproducible methodology to measure the device's highest achievable spatial accuracy and precision under controlled motion trajectories and tracking scenarios, including static positioning, sinusoidal 1D dynamic motions, and circular 2D planar movements at varying tangential velocities. Additionally, we investigated the contribution of different device sensors to overall positioning error by manually blocking specific sensor inputs. The analysis revealed an average localization error of approximately 5 mm with a standard deviation of 5.5 mm, representing the device's accuracy and precision, respectively. The goal is to provide realistic expectations of MR readiness levels with respect to its highest achievable accuracy and precision, shedding light on its capabilities and limitations for different applications. Bruno G. C. Lima, Bruno Georgevich, Tiago F. Vieira, Edvar Neto, Renalvo Júnior, Arthur Da Costa Vangasse, Vergilio Del Claro |
ISMAR | 6 |