Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Samuel Power

dblp:364/2735 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 66% Optimization for machine learning · 23% Learning theory · 11%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
1.022025
Momentum Particle Maximum Likelihood · ICML 2024
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation
1.022025
Momentum Particle Maximum Likelihood · ICML 2024
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
0.912025
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent
0.912025
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › estimation error bounds
non-asymptotic error bounds
0.912025
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Algorithms and data structures › markov chains › mixing time
log-sobolev inequality
0.912025
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.912025
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian model selection
0.812024
Bivariate Causal Discovery using Bayesian Model Selection · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
bivariate causal discovery
0.812024
Bivariate Causal Discovery using Bayesian Model Selection · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery
0.812024
Bivariate Causal Discovery using Bayesian Model Selection · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › sequential monte carlo
particle method
0.812024
Momentum Particle Maximum Likelihood · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polyak-łojasiewicz inequality · 1.7gradient flow · 1.7bakry-émery theory · 1.7optimal transport · 0.8nesterov accelerated gradient · 0.8langevin diffusion · 0.8bayesian nonparametric model · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Prediction-Centric Uncertainty Quantification via MMD
abstract
Deterministic mathematical models, such as those specified via differential equations, are a powerful tool to communicate scientific insight. However, such models are necessarily simplified descriptions of the real world. Generalised Bayesian methodologies have been proposed for inference with misspecified models, but these are typically associated with vanishing parameter uncertainty as more data are observed. In the context of a misspecified deterministic mathematical model, this has the undesirable consequence that posterior predictions become deterministic and certain, while being incorrect. Taking this observation as a starting point, we propose \emph{Prediction-Centric Uncertainty Quantification}, where a mixture distribution based on the deterministic model confers improved uncertainty quantification in the predictive context. Computation of the mixing distribution is cast as a (regularised) gradient flow of the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD), enabling consistent numerical approximations to be obtained. Results are reported on both a toy model from population ecology and a real model of protein signalling in cell biology.
Zheyang Shen, Jeremias Knoblauch, Samuel Power, Chris J. Oates
AISTATS3
2025 Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities
abstract
We derive non-asymptotic error bounds for particle gradient descent (PGD, Kuntz et al. (2023)), a recently introduced algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of large latent variable models obtained by discretizing a gradient flow of the free energy. We begin by showing that the flow converges exponentially fast to the free energy's minimizers for models satisfying a condition that generalizes both the log-Sobolev and the Polyak--Łojasiewicz inequalities (LSI and PŁI, respectively). We achieve this by extending a result well-known in the optimal transport literature (that the LSI implies the Talagrand inequality) and its counterpart in the optimization literature (that the PŁI implies the so-called quadratic growth condition), and applying the extension to our new setting. We also generalize the Bakry--Émery Theorem and show that the LSI/PŁI extension holds for models with strongly concave log-likelihoods. For such models, we further control PGD's discretization error and obtain the non-asymptotic error bounds. While we are motivated by the study of PGD, we believe that the inequalities and results we extend may be of independent interest.
Rocco Caprio, Juan Kuntz, Samuel Power, Adam M. Johansen
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2024 Bivariate Causal Discovery using Bayesian Model Selection
abstract
Much of the causal discovery literature prioritises guaranteeing the identifiability of causal direction in statistical models. For structures within a Markov equivalence class, this requires strong assumptions which may not hold in real-world datasets, ultimately limiting the usability of these methods. Building on previous attempts, we show how to incorporate causal assumptions within the Bayesian framework. Identifying causal direction then becomes a Bayesian model selection problem. This enables us to construct models with realistic assumptions, and consequently allows for the differentiation between Markov equivalent causal structures. We analyse why Bayesian model selection works in situations where methods based on maximum likelihood fail. To demonstrate our approach, we construct a Bayesian non-parametric model that can flexibly model the joint distribution. We then outperform previous methods on a wide range of benchmark datasets with varying data generating assumptions.
Anish Dhir, Samuel Power, Mark van der Wilk
ICML2
2024 Momentum Particle Maximum Likelihood
abstract
Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of latent variable models is often recast as the minimization of a free energy functional over an extended space of parameters and probability distributions. This perspective was recently combined with insights from optimal transport to obtain novel particle-based algorithms for fitting latent variable models to data. Drawing inspiration from prior works which interpret ‘momentum-enriched’ optimization algorithms as discretizations of ordinary differential equations, we propose an analogous dynamical-systems-inspired approach to minimizing the free energy functional. The result is a dynamical system that blends elements of Nesterov’s Accelerated Gradient method, the underdamped Langevin diffusion, and particle methods. Under suitable assumptions, we prove that the continuous-time system minimizes the functional. By discretizing the system, we obtain a practical algorithm for MLE in latent variable models. The algorithm outperforms existing particle methods in numerical experiments and compares favourably with other MLE algorithms.
Jen Ning Lim, Juan Kuntz, Samuel Power, Adam M. Johansen
ICML3