Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Clara Mehler
dblp:364/4438
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice › computational social choice › multiwinner voting
approval-based committee voting |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Participation Incentives in Approval-Based Committee Elections · AAAI 2024 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice
computational social choice |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Participation Incentives in Approval-Based Committee Elections · AAAI 2024 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › incentive mechanism
participation incentives |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Participation Incentives in Approval-Based Committee Elections · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
NP-hardness proof · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Participation Incentives in Approval-Based Committee ElectionsabstractIn approval-based committee (ABC) voting, the goal is to choose a subset of predefined size of the candidates based on the voters’ approval preferences over the candidates. While this problem has attracted significant attention in recent years, the incentives for voters to participate in an election for a given ABC voting rule have been neglected so far. This paper is thus the first to explicitly study this property, typically called participation, for ABC voting rules. In particular, we show that all ABC scoring rules even satisfy group participation, whereas most sequential rules severely fail participation. We furthermore explore several escape routes to the impossibility for sequential ABC voting rules: we prove for many sequential rules that (i) they satisfy participation on laminar profiles, (ii) voters who approve none of the elected candidates cannot benefit by abstaining, and (iii) it is NP-hard for a voter to decide whether she benefits from abstaining Martin Bullinger, Chris Dong 0001, Patrick Lederer, Clara Mehler |
AAAI | 4 |