Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Clara Mehler

dblp:364/4438 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice › computational social choice › multiwinner voting
approval-based committee voting
0.812024
Participation Incentives in Approval-Based Committee Elections · AAAI 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice
computational social choice
0.812024
Participation Incentives in Approval-Based Committee Elections · AAAI 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › incentive mechanism
participation incentives
0.812024
Participation Incentives in Approval-Based Committee Elections · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

NP-hardness proof · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Participation Incentives in Approval-Based Committee Elections
abstract
In approval-based committee (ABC) voting, the goal is to choose a subset of predefined size of the candidates based on the voters’ approval preferences over the candidates. While this problem has attracted significant attention in recent years, the incentives for voters to participate in an election for a given ABC voting rule have been neglected so far. This paper is thus the first to explicitly study this property, typically called participation, for ABC voting rules. In particular, we show that all ABC scoring rules even satisfy group participation, whereas most sequential rules severely fail participation. We furthermore explore several escape routes to the impossibility for sequential ABC voting rules: we prove for many sequential rules that (i) they satisfy participation on laminar profiles, (ii) voters who approve none of the elected candidates cannot benefit by abstaining, and (iii) it is NP-hard for a voter to decide whether she benefits from abstaining
Martin Bullinger, Chris Dong 0001, Patrick Lederer, Clara Mehler
AAAI4