Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Lewis
dblp:364/7864
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Learning theory · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
langevin diffusion |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sampling and Estimation on Manifolds using the Langevin Diffusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sampling and Estimation on Manifolds using the Langevin Diffusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sampling and Estimation on Manifolds using the Langevin Diffusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retraction · 0.9langevin diffusion · 0.9discretization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Sampling and Estimation on Manifolds using the Langevin DiffusionabstractError bounds are derived for sampling and estimation using a discretization of an intrinsically defined Langevin diffusion with invariant measure $\text{d}\mu_\phi \propto e^{-\phi} \mathrm{dvol}_g $ on a compact Riemannian manifold. Two estimators of linear functionals of $\mu_\phi $ based on the discretized Markov process are considered: a time-averaging estimator based on a single trajectory and an ensemble-averaging estimator based on multiple independent trajectories. Imposing no restrictions beyond a nominal level of smoothness on $\phi$, first-order error bounds, in discretization step size, on the bias and variance/mean-square error of both estimators are derived. The order of error matches the optimal rate in Euclidean and flat spaces, and leads to a first-order bound on distance between the invariant measure $\mu_\phi$ and a stationary measure of the discretized Markov process. This order is preserved even upon using retractions when exponential maps are unavailable in closed form, thus enhancing practicality of the proposed algorithms. Generality of the proof techniques, which exploit links between two partial differential equations and the semigroup of operators corresponding to the Langevin diffusion, renders them amenable for the study of a more general class of sampling algorithms related to the Langevin diffusion. Conditions for extending analysis to the case of non-compact manifolds are discussed. Numerical illustrations with distributions, log-concave and otherwise, on the manifolds of positive and negative curvature elucidate on the derived bounds and demonstrate practical utility of the sampling algorithm. Karthik Bharath, Alexander Lewis, Akash Sharma, Michael V. Tretyakov |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |