We study the tasks of deterministically condensing and extracting from Online Non-Oblivious Symbol Fixing (oNOSF) sources, a natural model of defective randomness where extraction is impossible in many parameter regimes [AORSV, EUROCRYPT'20]. A $(g,\ell)$-oNOSF source is a sequence of $\ell$ blocks where at least $g$ blocks are good (independent, with min-entropy) and the remaining bad blocks are controlled by an online adversary and can be arbitrarily correlated with prior blocks. Previously, [CGR, FOCS'24] proved impossibility of condensing beyond rate $1/2$ when $g\le 0.5 \ell$ and showed existence of condensers for when $g \ge 0.51\ell$ and $n$ is exponential in $\ell$. In this work, not only do we construct the first explicit condensers matching the existential results of [CGR, FOCS'24], but we make a doubly exponential improvement by handling the case when $g\ge 0.51\ell$ and $n$ is only polylogarithmic in $\ell$. We also obtain a much improved explicit construction for transforming low-entropy oNOSF sources into uniform oNOSF sources. Next, we essentially resolve the question of the existence of condensers for oNOSF sources by showing the existence of condensers even when $n$ is a large enough constant and $\ell$ is growing (provided $g \ge 0.51\ell$). We apply our condensers to collective coin flipping and collective sampling, widely studied problems in fault-tolerant distributed computing, and provide very simple protocols for them. Finally, we study the possibility of extraction from oNOSF sources. For lower bounds, we introduce the notion of online influence - extending the notion of influence of boolean functions - and establish tight bounds that imply extraction lower bounds. We also construct explicit extractors via leader election protocols that beat standard resilient functions [AL, Combinatorica'93].

Random selection is a fundamental task in fault-tolerant distributed computing where processors select a random outcome from some domain. Two special cases of this, leader election (where the processors designate a leader amongst themselves) and collective coin flipping (where the processors agree on a common random bit), have been especially widely studied. We study these problems in the full-information model, where processors communicate via a single broadcast channel, have access to private randomness, and face a computationally unbounded adversary that controls some of the processors. Despite decades of study, key gaps remain in our understanding of the trade-offs between round complexity, communication per player in each round, and adversarial resilience. We make progress by proving new lower bounds for coin flipping protocols and both new upper and lower bounds for leader election and random selection protocols.

While the existence of randomness extractors, both seeded and seedless, has been studied for many sources of randomness, currently, not much is known regarding the existence of seedless condensers in many settings. Here, we prove several new results for seedless condensers in the context of three related classes of sources: Non-Oblivious Symbol Fixing (NOSF) sources, online NOSF (oNOSF) sources (originally defined as SHELA sources in [1]), and almost Chor-Goldreich (CG) sources as defined in [2]. We will think of these sources as a sequence of random variables$\mathbf{X}=\mathbf{X}_{1}, \ldots,\mathbf{X}_{\ell}$on$\ell$symbols where at least$g$out of these$\ell$symbols are “good” (i.e., have some min-entropy requirement), denoted as a$(g, \ell)-\mathbf{source}$, and the remaining “bad”$\ell-g$symbols may adversarially depend on these$g$good blocks. The difference between each of these sources is realized by restrictions on the power of the adversary, with the adversary in NOSF sources having no restrictions. Prior to our work, the only known seedless condenser upper or lower bound in these settings is due to [2], where they explicitly construct a seedless condenser for a restricted subset of$(g,\ell)- \mathbf{adversarial}$CG sources. The following are our main results concerning seedless condensers for each of these sources. 1) oNOSF sources a) When$g\leq\ell/2$, we prove that condensing with error 0.99 above rate$\frac{1}{\lfloor\ell/g\rfloor}$is impossible. In fact, we show that this is tight. b) Quite surprisingly, for$g > \ell/2$, we show the existence of excellent condensers for uniform oNOSF sources. In addition, we show the existence of similar condensers for oNOSF sources with only logarithmic min-entropy. Our results are based on a new type of two-source extractors, called output-light two-source extractors, that we introduce and prove the existence of. 2) Adversarial CG sources a) We observe that uniform adversarial CG sources are equivalent to uniform oNOSF sources and consequently inherit the same results. b) We show that one cannot condense beyond the min-entropy gap of each block or condense low min-entropy CG sources above rate 1/2. 3) NOSF sources a) We show that condensing with constant error above rate$\frac{g}{\ell}$is impossible for uniform NOSF sources for any$g$and$\ell$, thus ruling out the possibility of any non-trivial condensing. This shows an interesting distinction between NOSF and oNOSF sources.