Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tomer Garber

dblp:364/8143 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.622025
Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Few-Step Guidance of Consistency Models (and Beyond) · CVPR 2025
Image Restoration by Denoising Diffusion Models with Iteratively Preconditioned Guidance · CVPR 2024
Image and video processing
image restoration
1.622025
Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Few-Step Guidance of Consistency Models (and Beyond) · CVPR 2025
Image Restoration by Denoising Diffusion Models with Iteratively Preconditioned Guidance · CVPR 2024
Image and video processing › super-resolution
image super-resolution
1.622025
Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Few-Step Guidance of Consistency Models (and Beyond) · CVPR 2025
Image Restoration by Denoising Diffusion Models with Iteratively Preconditioned Guidance · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
consistency model
0.912025
Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Few-Step Guidance of Consistency Models (and Beyond) · CVPR 2025
Image and video processing › image restoration
image inpainting
0.912025
Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Few-Step Guidance of Consistency Models (and Beyond) · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
guided diffusion
0.812024
Image Restoration by Denoising Diffusion Models with Iteratively Preconditioned Guidance · CVPR 2024
Image and video processing › image restoration
image deblurring
0.812024
Image Restoration by Denoising Diffusion Models with Iteratively Preconditioned Guidance · CVPR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

back-projection guidance · 3.3noise injection · 1.7preconditioning · 1.5least squares guidance · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Few-Step Guidance of Consistency Models (and Beyond)
abstract
In recent years, it has become popular to tackle image restoration tasks with a single pretrained diffusion model (DM) and data-fidelity guidance, instead of training a dedicated deep neural network per task. However, such "zero-shot" restoration schemes currently require many Neural Function Evaluations (NFEs) for performing well, which may be attributed to the many NFEs needed in the original generative functionality of the DMs. Recently, faster variants of DMs have been explored for image generation. These include Consistency Models (CMs), which can generate samples via a couple of NFEs. However, existing works that use guided CMs for restoration still require tens of NFEs or fine-tuning of the model per task that leads to performance drop if the assumptions during the fine-tuning are not accurate. In this paper, we propose a zero-shot restoration scheme that uses CMs and operates well with as little as 4 NFEs. It is based on a wise combination of several ingredients: better initialization, back-projection guidance, and above all a novel noise injection mechanism. We demonstrate the advantages of our approach for image super-resolution, deblurring and inpainting. Interestingly, we show that the usefulness of our noise injection technique goes beyond CMs: it can also mitigate the performance degradation of existing guided DM methods when reducing their NFE count. The source code is available at https://github.com/tirer-lab/CM4IR
Tomer Garber, Tom Tirer
CVPR1
2025 Zero-Shot Image Restoration via Few-Step Guidance of Consistency Models
abstract
Recently, it has become popular to tackle image restoration tasks with a single pretrained (unconditional) denoising diffusion model (DDM) and data-fidelity guidance, instead of training a dedicated deep neural network per task. However, such "zero-shot" restoration schemes require many Neural Function Evaluations (NFEs). This follows from the need of iterative schemes with many NFEs already in the original generative functionality of the DDMs. Very recently, faster variants of DDMs have been explored for image generation. A prominent alternative are Consistency Models (CMs), which can generate samples via a couple of NFEs. However, existing works that use guided CMs for restoration still require tens of NFEs or fine-tuning of the model per task. Clearly, the latter is not a zero-shot strategy and, as such, leads to performance drop if the assumptions during the fine-tuning (e.g., the noise level) are not accurate. In this paper, we propose a zero-shot restoration scheme that uses CMs and operates well with as little as 4 NFEs. It is based on a wise combination of several ingredients: better initialization, back-projection guidance, and above all a novel noise injection mechanism. We demonstrate the advantages of our approach for image super-resolution and inpainting.
Tomer Garber, Tom Tirer
ICASSP1
2024 Image Restoration by Denoising Diffusion Models with Iteratively Preconditioned Guidance
abstract
Training deep neural networks has become a common approach for addressing image restoration problems. An alternative for training a “task-specific” network for each observation model is to use pretrained deep denoisers for imposing only the signal's prior within iterative algorithms, without additional training. Recently, a sampling-based variant of this approach has become popular with the rise of diffusion/score-based generative models. Using denois-ers for general purpose restoration requires guiding the it-erations to ensure agreement of the signal with the observations. In low-noise settings, guidance that is based on back-projection (BP) has been shown to be a promising strat-egy (used recently also under the names “pseudoinverse” or “range/null-space” guidance). However, the presence of noise in the observations hinders the gains from this approach. In this paper, we propose a novel guidance technique, based on preconditioning that allows traversing from BP-based guidance to least squares based guidance along the restoration scheme. The proposed approach is robust to noise while still having much simpler implementation than alternative methods (e.g., it does not require SVD or a large number of iterations). We use it within both an optimization scheme and a sampling-based scheme, and demonstrate its advantages over existing methods for image deblurring and super-resolution.
Tomer Garber, Tom Tirer
CVPR1