Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luke Neureiter

dblp:365/3423 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.812024
Outlier Ranking for Large-Scale Public Health Data · AAAI 2024
Data mining › anomaly detection › outlier detection
outlier ranking
0.812024
Outlier Ranking for Large-Scale Public Health Data · AAAI 2024
Medical and health informatics › public health › public health informatics
outbreak detection
0.212024
Outlier Ranking for Large-Scale Public Health Data · AAAI 2024
Medical and health informatics › public health › public health informatics
public health surveillance
0.212024
Outlier Ranking for Large-Scale Public Health Data · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical networks · 1.5extreme value analysis · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Outlier Ranking for Large-Scale Public Health Data
abstract
Disease control experts inspect public health data streams daily for outliers worth investigating, like those corresponding to data quality issues or disease outbreaks. However, they can only examine a few of the thousands of maximally-tied outliers returned by univariate outlier detection methods applied to large-scale public health data streams. To help experts distinguish the most important outliers from these thousands of tied outliers, we propose a new task for algorithms to rank the outputs of any univariate method applied to each of many streams. Our novel algorithm for this task, which leverages hierarchical networks and extreme value analysis, performed the best across traditional outlier detection metrics in a human-expert evaluation using public health data streams. Most importantly, experts have used our open-source Python implementation since April 2023 and report identifying outliers worth investigating 9.1x faster than their prior baseline. Other organizations can readily adapt this implementation to create rankings from the outputs of their tailored univariate methods across large-scale streams.
Ananya Joshi 0001, Tina Townes, Nolan Gormley, Luke Neureiter, Ronald Rosenfeld, Bryan Wilder
AAAI4