In performative stochastic optimization, decisions can influence the distribution of random parameters, rendering the data-generating process itself decision-dependent. In practice, decision-makers rarely have access to the true distribution map and must instead rely on imperfect surrogate models, which can lead to severely suboptimal solutions under misspecification. Data scarcity or costly collection further exacerbates these challenges in real-world settings. To address these challenges, we propose a distributionally robust framework for performative optimization that explicitly accounts for ambiguity in the decision-dependent distribution. Our framework introduces three modeling paradigms that capture a broad range of applications in machine learning and decision-making under uncertainty. This latter setting has not previously been explored in the performative optimization literature. To tackle the intractability of the resulting nonconvex objectives, we develop an iterative algorithm named repeated robust risk minimization, which alternates between solving a decision-independent distributionally robust optimization problem and updating the ambiguity set based on the previous decision. This decoupling ensures computational tractability at each iteration while enhancing robustness to model uncertainty. We provide reformulations compatible with off-the-shelf solvers and establish theoretical guarantees on convergence and suboptimality. Extensive numerical experiments in strategic classification, revenue management, and portfolio optimization demonstrate significant performance gains over state-of-the-art baselines, highlighting the practical value of our approach.

We consider the problem of learning fair policies for multi-stage selection problems from observational data. This problem arises in several high-stakes domains such as company hiring, loan approval, or bail decisions where outcomes (e.g., career success, loan repayment, recidivism) are only observed for those selected. We propose a multi-stage framework that can be augmented with various fairness constraints, such as demographic parity or equal opportunity. This problem is a highly intractable infinite chance-constrained program involving the unknown joint distribution of covariates and outcomes. Motivated by the potential impact of selection decisions on people’s lives and livelihoods, we propose to focus on interpretable linear selection rules. Leveraging tools from causal inference and sample average approximation, we obtain an asymptotically consistent solution to this selection problem by solving a mixed binary conic optimization problem, which can be solved using standard off-the-shelf solvers. We conduct extensive computational experiments on a variety of datasets adapted from the UCI repository on which we show that our proposed approaches can achieve an 11.6% improvement in precision and a 38% reduction in the measure of unfairness compared to the existing selection policy.