Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haoyang Ling

dblp:365/9163 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
reasoning evaluation
0.812024
NPHardEval: Dynamic Benchmark on Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models via Complexity Classes · ACL (1) 2024
Computational complexity
complexity classes
0.812024
NPHardEval: Dynamic Benchmark on Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models via Complexity Classes · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic benchmarking · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 NPHardEval: Dynamic Benchmark on Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models via Complexity Classes
abstract
Complex reasoning ability is one of the most important features of Large Language Models (LLMs). Numerous benchmarks have been established to assess the reasoning abilities of LLMs. However, they are inadequate in offering a rigorous evaluation and prone to the risk of overfitting, as these publicly accessible and static benchmarks allow models to potentially tailor their responses to specific benchmark metrics, thereby inflating their performance. Addressing these limitations, we introduce a new benchmark NPHardEval. It contains a broad spectrum of 900 algorithmic questions belonging up to the NP-Hard complexity class, offering a rigorous measure of the reasoning ability of LLMs utilizing computational complexity. Moreover, this benchmark is designed with a dynamic update mechanism, where the datapoints are refreshed on a monthly basis. Such regular updates play a crucial role in mitigating the risk of LLMs overfitting to the benchmark, promoting a more accurate and reliable assessment of their reasoning capabilities. The benchmark dataset and code of NPHardEval are available at https://github.com/casmlab/NPHardEval.
Lizhou Fan, Wenyue Hua, Lingyao Li, Haoyang Ling
ACL (1)4