Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wen-pan Li
dblp:366/1949
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2895-5581ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Multi-agent systems · 27% Trustworthy machine learning · 27% Optimization for machine learning · 27% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computational photography and imaging · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational photography and imaging
camera calibration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Per-Pixel Calibration Based on Multi-View 3D Reconstruction Errors Beyond the Depth of Field · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Novel Dual-Robot Accurate Calibration Method Using Convex Optimization and Lie Derivative · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convex optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Novel Dual-Robot Accurate Calibration Method Using Convex Optimization and Lie Derivative · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-robot systems |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Novel Dual-Robot Accurate Calibration Method Using Convex Optimization and Lie Derivative · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
multi-view reconstruction |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Per-Pixel Calibration Based on Multi-View 3D Reconstruction Errors Beyond the Depth of Field · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2025 |
Computational photography and imaging
microscopy imaging |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Per-Pixel Calibration Based on Multi-View 3D Reconstruction Errors Beyond the Depth of Field · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
lie group |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Novel Dual-Robot Accurate Calibration Method Using Convex Optimization and Lie Derivative · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-view reconstruction error minimization · 1.7newton-like iterative method · 0.8lie derivative · 0.8convex optimization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Self-Correcting and Globally-Consistent 3D Cross-Ratio Invariant Model for Multi-View Microscopic ProfilometryabstractThis article introduces a multiview 3-D microscopic profilometry system equipped with tilted cameras adhering to the Scheimpflug condition and a vertically aligned projector. It utilizes a novel 3-D cross-ratio invariant (3D-CRI) model that offers inherent self-correction, enhanced global consistency, and computational efficiency. The inherent self-correction mitigates optical contaminations like multiple reflections by using deviations from the epipolar line for optimal candidate selection. The model is also designed as spatial lines to associate the approximate linear error distribution across depths, thereby facilitating its further correction (e.g., proposed embedded linear compensation method to address data inconsistency among various binocular projector-camera setups). Additionally, the model simplifies computational demands by directly correlating phase differences to spatial coordinates. Furthermore, a conversion method from the triangular stereo to the 3D-CRI model is developed, avoiding the complex per-pixel calibration. The experiments are conducted to verify robustness, globally consistent accuracy, and speed performance. The experimental results validate that the system is robust to multiple reflections by testing on the printed circuit boards with dense components. The global consistency is also verified by the experiments with better quantitative metrics within the whole measurement range over ten times the depth of field. In particular, the quantitative metrics of theZ-axis are halved. The speed performance shows that our method is the fastest among competing techniques. Rong Dai, Xueyan Tang, Wen-pan Li, Yun-Hui Liu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics | 3 |
| 2025 | Per-Pixel Calibration Based on Multi-View 3D Reconstruction Errors Beyond the Depth of FieldabstractIn 3D microscopic imaging, the extremely shallow depth of field presents a challenge for accurate 3D reconstruction in cases of significant defocus. Traditional calibration methods rely on the spatial extraction of feature points to establish spatial 3D information as the optimization objective. However, these methods suffer from reduced extraction accuracy under defocus conditions, which causes degradation of calibration performance. To extend calibration volume without compromising accuracy in defocused scenarios, we propose a per-pixel calibration based on multi-view 3D reconstruction errors. It utilizes 3D reconstruction errors among different binocular setups as an optimization objective. We first analyze multi-view 3D reconstruction error distributions under the poor-accuracy optical model by employing a multi-view microscopic 3D measurement system using telecentric lenses. Subsequently, the 3D proportion model is proposed for implementing our error-based per-pixel calibration, derived as a spatial linear expression directly correlated with the 3D reconstruction error distribution. The experimental results confirm the robust convergence of our method with multiple binocular setups. Near the focus volume, the multi-view 3D reconstruction error remains approximately m (less than 0.5 camera pixel pitch), with absolute accuracy maintained within 0.5% of the measurement range. Beyond tenfold depth of field, the multi-view 3D reconstruction error increases to around m (still less than 2 camera pixel pitches), while absolute accuracy remains within 1% of the measurement range. These high-precision measurement results validate the feasibility and accuracy of our proposed calibration. Rong Dai, Wen-pan Li, Yun-Hui Liu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 2 |
| 2024 | A Novel Dual-Robot Accurate Calibration Method Using Convex Optimization and Lie DerivativeabstractCalibrating unknown transformation relationships is an essential task for multirobot cooperative systems. Traditional linear methods are inadequate to decouple and simultaneously solve the unknown matrices due to their intercoupling. This article proposes a novel dual-robot accurate calibration method that uses convex optimization and Lie derivative to solve the dual-robot calibration problem simultaneously. The key idea is that a convex optimization model based on dual-robot transformation chain is established using Lie representation of special Euclidean group in 3 dimensions [SE(3)]. The Jacobian matrix of the established optimization model is explicitly derived using the corresponding Lie derivative ofSE(3). To balance the influence of the magnitudes of the rotational and translational optimization variables, a weight coefficient is defined. Due to the closure and smoothness of Lie group, the optimization model can be solved simultaneously using Newton-like iterative methods without additional orthogonalization processing. The performance of the proposed method is verified through simulation and actual calibration experiments. The results show that the proposed method outperforms the previous calibration methods in terms of accuracy and stability. The actual experiments are used to compare the proposed method with two existing calibration methods, and the mean measurement error of a certified ceramic sphere is reduced from 0.9205 and 0.5363 to 0.4381 mm, respectively. Cheng Jiang 0007, Wenlong Li 0001, Wen-pan Li, Dong-fang Wang, Lijun Zhu 0001, Wei Xu 0027, Huan Zhao 0001, Han Ding 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 3 |