Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brantley Morgan
dblp:366/3555
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 50% Data mining · 50% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Usable security · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › text mining
information extraction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ChronoCTI: Mining Knowledge Graph of Temporal Relations Among Cyberattack Actions · ICDM 2024 |
Usable security › security operations › security analytics
cyber threat intelligence |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | ChronoCTI: Mining Knowledge Graph of Temporal Relations Among Cyberattack Actions · ICDM 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
natural language processing · 1.5machine learning · 1.5large language model · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mining temporal attack patterns from cyberthreat intelligence reportsabstractAbstract Cyberthreat intelligence (CTI) reports on past cyberattacks describe the sequence of actions of attackers in terms of time. The sequence contains temporal relations among attack actions, such as a malware is first downloaded and then executed. Information related to temporal relations enables cybersecurity practitioners to investigate past cyberattack incidents and analyze attackers’ behavior. However, cybersecurity practitioners must extract such information automatically, in a structured manner, through a common vocabulary to reduce human effort and enable sharing, and collaboration. The goal of this paper is to aid security practitioners in proactive defense against attacks by automatic information extraction of temporal relations among attack actions from cyberthreat intelligence reports. We propose ChronoCTI, an automated pipeline for extracting temporal relations among attack actions from CTI reports. The attack actions are represented as MITRE ATT&CK techniques, and the relations are represented as a knowledge graph. To construct ChronoCTI, we build a ground truth dataset of temporal relations and apply large language models, natural language processing, and machine learning techniques. ChronoCTI demonstrates higher precision but lower recall performance on a real-world dataset of 94 CTI reports. We apply ChronoCTI on a set of 713 CTI reports, where we identify 9 categories of temporal attack patterns consisting of 124 temporal attack patterns. We identify that the most prevalent pattern category is to trick victim users into executing malicious code to initiate the attack, followed by bypassing the anti-malware system in the victim software systems. Based on the observed patterns, we advocate for training users about cybersecurity best practices, introducing appropriate warning messages for end-users, introducing immutable operating systems, and enforcing multi-user authentications. Moreover, we advocate that practitioners leverage the automated mining capability of ChronoCTI and design countermeasures against recurring attack patterns. Rayhanur Rahman, Brandon Wroblewski, Quinn Matthews, Brantley Morgan, Tim Menzies, Laurie A. Williams |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 4 |
| 2024 | ChronoCTI: Mining Knowledge Graph of Temporal Relations Among Cyberattack ActionsabstractCyberthreat intelligence (CTI) reports on past cyberattacks describe the sequence of actions of attackers in terms of time. The sequence contains temporal relations among attack actions, such as a malware is first downloaded and then executed. Information related to temporal relations enables cybersecurity practitioners to investigate past cyberattack incidents and analyze attackers' behavior. However, cybersecurity practitioners must extract such information automatically, in a structured manner, through a common vocabulary to reduce human effort and enable sharing, and collaboration. The goal of this paper is to aid security practitioners in proactive defense against attacks by automatic information extraction of temporal relations among attack actions from cyberthreat intelligence reports. We propose ChronoCTI, an automated pipeline for extracting temporal relations among attack actions from CTI reports. The attack actions are represented as MITRE ATT&CK techniques, and the relations are represented as a knowledge graph. To construct ChronoCTI, we build a ground truth dataset of temporal relations and apply large language models, natural language processing, and machine learning techniques. ChronoCTI demonstrates higher precision but lower recall performance on a real-world dataset of 94 CTI reports. ChronoCTI achieves macro precision, recall, and F1 scores of 0.75, 0.46, and 0.54, respectively. ChronoCTI aids practitioners in analyzing large volumes of CTI reports, thinking like attackers, and knowing what attack actions are likely to happen next, which enables the practitioners to assess imminent threats and strengthen their cybersecurity readiness. Rayhanur Rahman, Brandon Wroblewski, Quinn Matthews, Brantley Morgan, Tim Menzies, Laurie A. Williams |
ICDM | 4 |