Abstract Language models, potentially augmented with tool usage such as retrieval, are becoming the go-to means of answering questions. Understanding and answering questions in real-world settings often requires retrieving information from different sources, processing and aggregating data to extract insights, and presenting complex findings in form of structured artifacts such as novel tables, charts, or infographics. In this paper, we introduce TANQ,1 the first open-domain question answering dataset where the answers require building tables from information across multiple sources. We release the full source attribution for every cell in the resulting table and benchmark state-of-the-art language models in open, oracle, and closed book setups. Our best-performing baseline, Gemini Flash, reaches an overall F1 score of 60.7, lagging behind human performance by 12.3 points. We analyze baselines’ performance across different dataset attributes such as different skills required for this task, including multi-hop reasoning, math operations, and unit conversions. We further discuss common failures in model-generated answers, suggesting that TANQ is a complex task with many challenges ahead.

We consider the task of generating structured representations of text using large language models (LLMs).We focus on tables and mind maps as representative modalities.Tables are more organized way of representing data, while mind maps provide a visually dynamic and flexible approach, particularly suitable for sparse content.Despite the effectiveness of LLMs on different tasks, we show that current models struggle with generating structured outputs.In response, we present effective prompting strategies for both of these tasks.We introduce a taxonomy of problems around factuality, global and local structure, common to both modalities and propose a set of critiques to tackle these issues resulting in an absolute improvement in accuracy of +37pp (79%) for mind maps and +15pp (78%) for tables.To evaluate semantic coverage of generated structured representations we propose AUTO-QA, and we verify the adequacy of AUTO-QA using SQuAD dataset.We further evaluate the usefulness of structured representations via a text comprehension user study.The results show a significant reduction in comprehension time compared to text when using table (42.9%) and mind map (31.9%), without loss in accuracy.