Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael C. Hunter
dblp:367/2144
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-3775-7922ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
assurance case |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CoDefeater: Using LLMs To Find Defeaters in Assurance Cases · ASE 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | CoDefeater: Using LLMs To Find Defeaters in Assurance CasesabstractConstructing assurance cases is a widely used and sometimes required process toward demonstrating that safety-critical systems will operate safely in their planned environment. To mitigate the risk of errors and missing edge cases, the concept of defeaters - challenges to claims in an assurance case - has been introduced. Defeaters can detect weaknesses in the arguments, prompting further investigation and timely mitigations. However, capturing defeaters relies on expert judgment, experience, and creativity and must be done iteratively due to evolving requirements and regulations. In this paper, we propose CoDefeater, an automated process to leverage large language models (LLMs) for finding defeaters. Initial results on two systems show that LLMs can efficiently find known and unforeseen feasible defeaters to support safety analysts in enhancing the completeness and confidence of assurance cases. Usman Gohar, Michael C. Hunter, Robyn R. Lutz, Myra B. Cohen |
ASE | 2 |