Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amisha Priyadarshini
dblp:367/3826
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Fair Representations with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fair representation learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Fair Representations with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Fair Representations with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spline-based architecture · 1.0kolmogorov-arnold network · 1.0adversarial learning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Learning Fair Representations with Kolmogorov-Arnold NetworksabstractDespite recent advances in fairness-aware machine learning, predictive models often exhibit discriminatory behavior towards marginalized groups. Such unfairness might arise from biased training data, model design, or representational disparities across groups, posing significant challenges in high-stakes decision-making domains such as college admissions. While existing fair learning models aim to mitigate bias, achieving an optimal trade-off between fairness and accuracy remains a challenge. Moreover, the reliance on black-box models hinders interpretability, limiting their applicability in socially sensitive domains. To circumvent these issues, we propose integrating Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) within a fair adversarial learning framework. Leveraging the adversarial robustness and interpretability of KANs, our approach facilitates stable adversarial learning. We derive theoretical insights into the spline-based KAN architecture that ensure stability during adversarial optimization. Additionally, an adaptive fairness penalty update mechanism is proposed to strike a balance between fairness and accuracy. We back these findings with empirical evidence on two real-world admissions datasets, demonstrating the proposed framework's efficiency in achieving fairness across sensitive attributes while preserving predictive performance. Amisha Priyadarshini, Sergio Gago Masagué |
AAAI | 1 |