Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aditya Tomar
dblp:367/3858
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Language models and text generation · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
High-performance computing · 43% Distributed systems · 43% Memory systems · 15% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | QuantSpec: Self-Speculative Decoding with Hierarchical Quantized KV Cache · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model inference
long-context inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | QuantSpec: Self-Speculative Decoding with Hierarchical Quantized KV Cache · ICML 2025 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Democratizing AI: Open-source Scalable LLM Training on GPU-based Supercomputers · SC 2024 |
High-performance computing
large-scale training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Democratizing AI: Open-source Scalable LLM Training on GPU-based Supercomputers · SC 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Democratizing AI: Open-source Scalable LLM Training on GPU-based Supercomputers · SC 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › parallelization
parallel training |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Democratizing AI: Open-source Scalable LLM Training on GPU-based Supercomputers · SC 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weight quantization · 1.7speculative decoding · 1.7KV cache quantization · 1.7performance modeling · 1.5four-dimensional hybrid parallelism · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | QuantSpec: Self-Speculative Decoding with Hierarchical Quantized KV CacheabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being deployed on edge devices for long-context settings, creating a growing need for fast and efficient long-context inference. In these scenarios, the Key-Value (KV) cache is the primary bottleneck in terms of both GPU memory and latency, as the full KV cache must be loaded for each decoding step. While speculative decoding is a widely accepted technique to accelerate autoregressive decoding, existing methods often struggle to achieve significant speedups due to inefficient KV cache optimization strategies and result in low acceptance rates. To address these challenges, we propose a novel self-speculative decoding framework, QuantSpec, where the draft model shares the architecture of the target model but employs a hierarchical 4-bit quantized KV cache and 4-bit quantized weights for acceleration. QuantSpec maintains high acceptance rates ($>$90\%) and reliably provides consistent end-to-end speedups upto $\sim2.5\times$, outperforming other self-speculative decoding methods that use sparse KV cache for long-context LLM inference. QuantSpec also reduces the memory requirements by $\sim 1.3\times$ compared to these alternatives. Rishabh Tiwari, Haocheng Xi, Aditya Tomar, Coleman Hooper, Sehoon Kim 0001, Maxwell Horton, Mahyar Najibi, Michael W. Mahoney, Kurt Keutzer, Amir Gholami |
ICML | 3 |
| 2025 | BharatBBQ: A Multilingual Bias Benchmark for Question Answering in the Indian ContextabstractAbstract Evaluating social biases in language models (LMs) is crucial for ensuring fairness and minimizing the reinforcement of harmful stereotypes in AI systems. Existing benchmarks, such as the Bias Benchmark for Question Answering (BBQ), primarily focus on Western contexts, limiting their applicability to the Indian context. To address this gap, we introduce BharatBBQ,1 a culturally adapted benchmark designed to assess biases in Hindi, English, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Telugu, Odia, and Assamese. BharatBBQ covers 13 social categories, including 3 intersectional groups, reflecting prevalent biases in the Indian sociocultural landscape. Our dataset contains 49,108 examples in one language that are expanded using translation and verification to 392,864 examples in eight different languages. We evaluate five multilingual LM families across zero- and few-shot settings, analyzing their bias and stereotypical bias scores. Our findings highlight persistent biases across languages and social categories and often amplified biases in Indian languages compared to English, demonstrating the necessity of linguistically and culturally grounded benchmarks for bias evaluation. Aditya Tomar, Nihar R. Sahoo, Pushpak Bhattacharyya |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2024 | Democratizing AI: Open-source Scalable LLM Training on GPU-based SupercomputersabstractTraining and fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) with hundreds of billions to trillions of parameters requires tens of thousands of GPUs, and a highly scalable software stack. In this work, we present a novel four-dimensional hybrid parallel algorithm implemented in a highly scalable, portable, open-source framework called AxoNn. We describe several performance optimizations in AxoNN to improve matrix multiply kernel performance, overlap non-blocking collectives with computation, and performance modeling to choose performance optimal configurations. These have resulted in unprecedented scaling and peak flop/s (bf16) for training of GPT-style transformer models on Perlmutter (620.1 Petaflop/s), Frontier (1.381 Exaflop/s) and Alps (1.423 Exaflop/s). While the abilities of LLMs improve with the number of trainable parameters, so do privacy and copyright risks caused by memorization of training data, which can cause disclosure of sensitive or private information at inference time. We highlight this side effect of scale through experiments that explore “catastrophic memorization,” where models are sufficiently large to memorize training data in a single pass, and present an approach to prevent it. As part of this study, we demonstrate fine-tuning of a 405-billion parameter LLM using AxoNN on Frontier. Prajwal Singhania, Aditya K. Ranjan, John Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Neel Jain, Abhimanyu Hans, Manli Shu, Aditya Tomar, Tom Goldstein, Abhinav Bhatele |
SC | 10 |