Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Basile Van Cooten

dblp:367/4035 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-0234-917XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 81% Data mining · 19%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › reranking
cross-encoder reranking
1.012026
IR Lens: A Tool for Interpreting Cross-Encoder Models · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval › retrieval models › sparse retrieval
learned sparse retrieval
1.012026
From Tokens to Concepts: Leveraging SAE for SPLADE · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
neural ranking model
1.012026
IR Lens: A Tool for Interpreting Cross-Encoder Models · SIGIR 2026
Data mining
representation learning
1.012026
From Tokens to Concepts: Leveraging SAE for SPLADE · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval › retrieval models › sparse retrieval › learned sparse retrieval
SPLADE
1.012026
From Tokens to Concepts: Leveraging SAE for SPLADE · SIGIR 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder
0.312026
From Tokens to Concepts: Leveraging SAE for SPLADE · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank › neural learning to rank
transformer-based ranking
0.312026
IR Lens: A Tool for Interpreting Cross-Encoder Models · SIGIR 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse autoencoder · 2.0learned sparse retrieval · 2.0neuron integrated gradients · 1.0ablation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 IR Lens: A Tool for Interpreting Cross-Encoder Models
abstract
Transformer-based ranking models, such as MonoBERT, are central to Information Retrieval; yet their inner workings remain largely opaque. This hinders not only our understanding of the systems implementing them, but also our ability to improve them. To alleviate this limitation, we introduce IR Lens, a new interpretability tool tailored to cross-encoders based on two key components: 1) Neuron Integrated Gradients to expose the contributions of model parts at multiple levels, and 2) targeted ablations to support hypothesis tracking. With its interactive graphical interface, IR Lens enables IR practitioners to explore, analyze, and manipulate neuron-level mechanisms in cross-encoders, facilitating a deeper understanding of neural ranking models. By extending the reach of existing interpretability methods, we believe IR Lens has the potential to support the improvement of cross-encoders.
Mihai Branga-Peicu, Mathias Vast, Basile Van Cooten, Laure Soulier, Jules Françoise, Benjamin Piwowarski, Baptiste Caramiaux
SIGIR3
2026 From Tokens to Concepts: Leveraging SAE for SPLADE
abstract
Learned Sparse IR models, such as SPLADE, offer an excellent efficiency-effectiveness tradeoff. However, they rely on the underlying backbone vocabulary, which might hinder performance (polysemicity and synonymy) and pose a challenge for multi-lingual and multi-modal usages. To solve this limitation, we propose to replace the backbone vocabulary with a latent space of semantic concepts learned using Sparse Auto-Encoders (SAE). Throughout this paper, we study the compatibility of these 2 concepts, explore training approaches, and analyze the differences between our SAE-SPLADE model and traditional SPLADE models. Our experiments demonstrate that SAE-SPLADE achieves retrieval performance comparable to SPLADE on both in-domain and out-of-domain tasks while offering improved efficiency.
Yuxuan Zong, Mathias Vast, Basile Van Cooten, Laure Soulier, Benjamin Piwowarski
SIGIR3