EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Johannes Schmalz
dblp:367/4415
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3389-2490ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 94% Reinforcement learning · 6% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Computational complexity · 74% Mathematical optimization · 26% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
stochastic shortest path |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | Efficient constraint generation for stochastic shortest path problems · Artif. Intell. 2026 Efficient Constraint Generation for Stochastic Shortest Path Problems · AAAI 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient constraint generation for stochastic shortest path problems · Artif. Intell. 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Probabilistic HTN Planning: Formalization and Computational Complexity Analysis · KR 2025 |
Computational complexity
undecidability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Probabilistic HTN Planning: Formalization and Computational Complexity Analysis · KR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
constraint generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Efficient Constraint Generation for Stochastic Shortest Path Problems · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient constraint generation for stochastic shortest path problems · Artif. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Probabilistic HTN Planning: Formalization and Computational Complexity Analysis · KR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
heuristic search · 2.8linear programming · 2.0constraint generation · 2.0markov decision process · 1.7computational complexity analysis · 1.7operations research · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Efficient constraint generation for stochastic shortest path problemsabstractStochastic Shortest Path problems (SSPs) are traditionally solved by computing each state’s cost-to-go by applying Bellman backups. A Bellman backup updates a state’s cost-to-go by iterating through every applicable action, computing the cost-to-go after applying each one, and selecting a minimal action’s cost-to-go. State-of-the-art algorithms use heuristic functions; these give an initial estimate of costs-to-go, and lets the algorithm apply Bellman backups only to promising states, determined by low estimated costs-to-go. However, each Bellman backup still considers all applicable actions, even if the heuristic tells us that some of these actions are too expensive, with the effect that such algorithms waste time on unhelpful actions. To address this gap we present a technique that uses the heuristic to avoid expensive actions, by reframing heuristic search in terms of linear programming and introducing an efficient implementation of constraint generation for SSPs. We present CG-iLAO*, a new algorithm that adapts iLAO* with our novel technique, and considers only 40% of iLAO*’s actions on many problems, and as few as 1% on some. Consequently, CG-iLAO* computes on average 3.5 × fewer costs-to-go for actions than the state-of-the-art iLAO* and LRTDP, enabling it to solve problems faster an average of 2.8 × and 3.7 × faster, respectively. Johannes Schmalz, Felipe W. Trevizan |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2025 | Solving Constrained Stochastic Shortest Path Problems with ScalarisationabstractConstrained Stochastic Shortest Path Problems (CSSPs) model problems with probabilistic effects, where a primary cost is minimised subject to constraints over secondary costs, e.g., minimise time subject to monetary budget. Current heuristic search algorithms for CSSPs solve a sequence of increasingly larger CSSPs as linear programs until an optimal solution for the original CSSP is found. In this paper, we introduce a novel algorithm CARL, which solves a series of unconstrained Stochastic Shortest Path Problems (SSPs) with efficient heuristic search algorithms. These SSP subproblems are constructed with scalarisations that project the CSSP’s vector of primary and secondary costs onto a scalar cost. CARL finds a maximising scalarisation using an optimisation algorithm similar to the subgradient method which, together with the solution to its associated SSP, yields a set of policies that are combined into an optimal policy for the CSSP. Our experiments show that CARL solves 50% more problems than the state-of-the-art on existing benchmarks. Johannes Schmalz, Felipe W. Trevizan |
ECAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Probabilistic HTN Planning: Formalization and Computational Complexity AnalysisabstractHierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning is an approach to sequential decision making that allows expressing complex grammar-like path constraints. In this paper, we first introduce an extension to HTN planning that takes probabilistic outcomes into account, and then study the computational complexity of deciding such problems either by finding a fixed sequence of actions (i.e., a conformant solution) or an outcome-dependent policy. This formalization extends factored Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) to have a hierarchical structure. In all studied cases, the conformant solutions are harder to obtain than their non-deterministic analogues, whereas policies are not always harder. Surprisingly, unlike their deterministic counterparts, severely restricted cases of probabilistic HTN problems are proven to be undecidable. The result holds even if all of the transition probabilities are bounded to be 0, 0.5, or 1. Mohammad Yousefi 0001, Johannes Schmalz, Patrik Haslum, Pascal Bercher |
KR | 2 |
| 2024 | Efficient Constraint Generation for Stochastic Shortest Path ProblemsabstractCurrent methods for solving Stochastic Shortest Path Problems (SSPs) find states’ costs-to-go by applying Bellman backups, where state-of-the-art methods employ heuristics to select states to back up and prune. A fundamental limitation of these algorithms is their need to compute the cost-to-go for every applicable action during each state backup, leading to unnecessary computation for actions identified as sub-optimal. We present new connections between planning and operations research and, using this framework, we address this issue of unnecessary computation by introducing an efficient version of constraint generation for SSPs. This technique allows algorithms to ignore sub-optimal actions and avoid computing their costs-to-go. We also apply our novel technique to iLAO* resulting in a new algorithm, CG-iLAO*. Our experiments show that CG-iLAO* ignores up to 57% of iLAO*’s actions and it solves problems up to 8x and 3x faster than LRTDP and iLAO*. Johannes Schmalz, Felipe W. Trevizan |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Finding Optimal Deterministic Policies for Constrained Stochastic Shortest Path ProblemsabstractConstrained Stochastic Shortest Path problems (CSSPs) are a modelling framework for probabilistic problems with a primary cost and constraints over secondary costs such as fuel consumption or monetary budget. While the optimal solution for a CSSP is usually a stochastic policy, practical considerations often demand deterministic solutions, for instance, in aviation and multi-agent systems. Previous works have addressed this issue for special cases of CSSPs; in this work, we show the technical issues in generalising these results and show how they can be addressed. Then, using these methods, we extend the state-of-the-art heuristic search method for finding optimal stochastic policies to efficiently find deterministic policies for CSSPs. We show experimentally that our algorithm competes with the state-of-the-art, and is able to solve the class of problems with difficult-to-satisfy constraints on which the state-of-the-art fails. Johannes Schmalz, Felipe W. Trevizan |
ECAI | 1 |