Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mingxian Fan
dblp:367/5040
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 33% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
human mesh recovery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Incorporating Test-Time Optimization into Training with Dual Networks for Human Mesh Recovery · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Incorporating Test-Time Optimization into Training with Dual Networks for Human Mesh Recovery · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
test-time optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Incorporating Test-Time Optimization into Training with Dual Networks for Human Mesh Recovery · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
meta-learning · 0.8dual networks · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Incorporating Test-Time Optimization into Training with Dual Networks for Human Mesh RecoveryabstractHuman Mesh Recovery (HMR) is the task of estimating a parameterized 3D human mesh from an image. There is a kind of methods first training a regression model for this problem, then further optimizing the pretrained regression model for any specific sample individually at test time. However, the pretrained model may not provide an ideal optimization starting point for the test-time optimization. Inspired by meta-learning, we incorporate the test-time optimization into training, performing a step of test-time optimization for each sample in the training batch before really conducting the training optimization over all the training samples. In this way, we obtain a meta-model, the meta-parameter of which is friendly to the test-time optimization. At test time, after several test-time optimization steps starting from the meta-parameter, we obtain much higher HMR accuracy than the test-time optimization starting from the simply pretrained regression model. Furthermore, we find test-time HMR objectives are different from training-time objectives, which reduces the effectiveness of the learning of the meta-model. To solve this problem, we propose a dual-network architecture that unifies the training-time and test-time objectives. Our method, armed with meta-learning and the dual networks, outperforms state-of-the-art regression-based and optimization-based HMR approaches, as validated by the extensive experiments. The codes are available at https://github.com/fmx789/Meta-HMR. Yongwei Nie, Mingxian Fan, Chengjiang Long, Qing Zhang 0006, Jian Zhu 0001, Xuemiao Xu |
NeurIPS | 2 |