Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mingxian Fan

dblp:367/5040 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 33% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
human mesh recovery
0.812024
Incorporating Test-Time Optimization into Training with Dual Networks for Human Mesh Recovery · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.812024
Incorporating Test-Time Optimization into Training with Dual Networks for Human Mesh Recovery · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
test-time optimization
0.812024
Incorporating Test-Time Optimization into Training with Dual Networks for Human Mesh Recovery · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-learning · 0.8dual networks · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Incorporating Test-Time Optimization into Training with Dual Networks for Human Mesh Recovery
abstract
Human Mesh Recovery (HMR) is the task of estimating a parameterized 3D human mesh from an image. There is a kind of methods first training a regression model for this problem, then further optimizing the pretrained regression model for any specific sample individually at test time. However, the pretrained model may not provide an ideal optimization starting point for the test-time optimization. Inspired by meta-learning, we incorporate the test-time optimization into training, performing a step of test-time optimization for each sample in the training batch before really conducting the training optimization over all the training samples. In this way, we obtain a meta-model, the meta-parameter of which is friendly to the test-time optimization. At test time, after several test-time optimization steps starting from the meta-parameter, we obtain much higher HMR accuracy than the test-time optimization starting from the simply pretrained regression model. Furthermore, we find test-time HMR objectives are different from training-time objectives, which reduces the effectiveness of the learning of the meta-model. To solve this problem, we propose a dual-network architecture that unifies the training-time and test-time objectives. Our method, armed with meta-learning and the dual networks, outperforms state-of-the-art regression-based and optimization-based HMR approaches, as validated by the extensive experiments. The codes are available at https://github.com/fmx789/Meta-HMR.
Yongwei Nie, Mingxian Fan, Chengjiang Long, Qing Zhang 0006, Jian Zhu 0001, Xuemiao Xu
NeurIPS2