Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wanjiao Liu

dblp:367/5668 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering › multiphysics simulation
fluid-structure interaction
0.912025
AutoHood3D: A Multi‑Modal Benchmark for Automotive Hood Design and Fluid-Structure Interaction · NeurIPS 2025
Computational science and engineering
multiphysics simulation
0.912025
AutoHood3D: A Multi‑Modal Benchmark for Automotive Hood Design and Fluid-Structure Interaction · NeurIPS 2025
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
physics-informed machine learning
0.912025
AutoHood3D: A Multi‑Modal Benchmark for Automotive Hood Design and Fluid-Structure Interaction · NeurIPS 2025
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
surrogate modeling
0.912025
AutoHood3D: A Multi‑Modal Benchmark for Automotive Hood Design and Fluid-Structure Interaction · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural surrogate · 0.9large-eddy simulation · 0.9finite element analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 AutoHood3D: A Multi‑Modal Benchmark for Automotive Hood Design and Fluid-Structure Interaction
abstract
This study presents a new high-fidelity multi-modal dataset containing 16000+ geometric variants of automotive hoods useful for machine learning (ML) applications such as engineering component design and process optimization, and multiphysics system surrogates. The dataset is centered on a practical multiphysics problem—hood deformation from fluid entrapment and inertial loading during rotary‑dip painting. Each hood is numerically modeled with a coupled Large-Eddy Simulation (LES)-Finite Element Analysis (FEA), using 1.2M cells in total to ensure spatial and temporal accuracy. The dataset provides time-resolved physical fields, along with STL meshes and structured natural language prompts for text-to-geometry synthesis. Existing datasets are either confined to 2D cases, exhibit limited geometric variations, or lack the multi‑modal annotations and data structures—shortcomings we address with AutoHood3D. We validate our numerical methodology, establish quantitative baselines across five neural architectures, and demonstrate systematic surrogate errors in displacement and force predictions. These findings motivate the design of novel approaches and multiphysics loss functions that enforce fluid–solid coupling during model training. By providing fully reproducible workflows, AutoHood3D enables physics‑aware ML development, accelerates generative‑design iteration, and facilitates the creation of new FSI benchmarks.
Vansh Sharma, Harish Jai Ganesh, Maryam Akram, Wanjiao Liu, Venkat Raman
NeurIPS4