Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William G. Powell

dblp:367/5708 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 94% Learning theory · 6%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
actor-critic methods
0.912025
Offline Actor-Critic for Average Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
average-reward reinforcement learning
0.912025
Offline Actor-Critic for Average Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
0.912025
Offline Actor-Critic for Average Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.912025
Offline Actor-Critic for Average Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic first-order methods
0.812024
Stochastic Optimization with Arbitrary Recurrent Data Sampling · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.812024
Stochastic Optimization with Arbitrary Recurrent Data Sampling · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning theory
0.312025
Offline Actor-Critic for Average Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.312025
Offline Actor-Critic for Average Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
decentralized optimization
0.212024
Stochastic Optimization with Arbitrary Recurrent Data Sampling · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

second-order cone programming · 0.9pessimistic value estimation · 0.9linear function approximation · 0.9recurrent sampling · 0.8incremental surrogate optimization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Offline Actor-Critic for Average Reward MDPs
abstract
We study offline policy optimization for infinite-horizon average-reward Markov decision processes (MDPs) with large or infinite state spaces. Specifically, we propose a pessimistic actor-critic algorithm that uses a computationally efficient linear function class for value function estimation. At the core of our method is a critic that computes a pessimistic estimate of the average reward under the current policy, as well as the corresponding policy gradient, by solving a fixed-point Bellman equation, rather than solving a successive sequence of regression problems as in finite horizon settings. This procedure reduces to solving a second-order cone program, which is computationally tractable. Our theoretical analysis is based on a weak partial data coverage assumption, which requires only that the offline data aligns well with the expected feature vector of a comparator policy. Under this condition, we show that our algorithm achieves the optimal sample complexity of O(\varepsilon^{-2}) for learning a near-optimal policy, up to model misspecification errors.
William G. Powell, Jeongyeol Kwon, Qiaomin Xie, Hanbaek Lyu
NeurIPS1
2024 Stochastic Optimization with Arbitrary Recurrent Data Sampling
abstract
For obtaining optimal first-order convergence guarantees for stochastic optimization, it is necessary to use a recurrent data sampling algorithm that samples every data point with sufficient frequency. Most commonly used data sampling algorithms (e.g., i.i.d., MCMC, random reshuffling) are indeed recurrent under mild assumptions. In this work, we show that for a particular class of stochastic optimization algorithms, we do not need any further property (e.g., independence, exponential mixing, and reshuffling) beyond recurrence in data sampling to guarantee optimal rate of first-order convergence. Namely, using regularized versions of Minimization by Incremental Surrogate Optimization (MISO), we show that for non-convex and possibly non-smooth objective functions with constraints, the expected optimality gap converges at an optimal rate $O(n^{-1/2})$ under general recurrent sampling schemes. Furthermore, the implied constant depends explicitly on the ’speed of recurrence’, measured by the expected amount of time to visit a data point, either averaged (’target time’) or supremized (’hitting time’) over the starting locations. We discuss applications of our general framework to decentralized optimization and distributed non-negative matrix factorization.
William G. Powell, Hanbaek Lyu
ICML1