EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wenshuo Chao
dblp:367/5753 · also Wen-Shuo Chao
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-3640-1087ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Recommender systems · 75% Data mining · 25% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 68% Reinforcement learning · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems
large language model-based recommendation |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | Hard vs. Noise: Resolving Hard-Noisy Sample Confusion in Recommender Systems via Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 Harnessing Large Language Models for Text-Rich Sequential Recommendation · WWW 2024 |
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Hard vs. Noise: Resolving Hard-Noisy Sample Confusion in Recommender Systems via Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Recommender systems › implicit feedback learning
implicit feedback denoising |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Hard vs. Noise: Resolving Hard-Noisy Sample Confusion in Recommender Systems via Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › chain-of-thought reasoning
chain-of-thought generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bag of Tricks for Inference-time Computation of LLM Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model inference
inference-time computation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bag of Tricks for Inference-time Computation of LLM Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Cross-View Hierarchical Graph Learning Hypernetwork for Skill Demand-Supply Joint Prediction · AAAI 2024 |
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Harnessing Large Language Models for Text-Rich Sequential Recommendation · WWW 2024 |
Data mining
time series analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Cross-View Hierarchical Graph Learning Hypernetwork for Skill Demand-Supply Joint Prediction · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
graph contrastive learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Hard vs. Noise: Resolving Hard-Noisy Sample Confusion in Recommender Systems via Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
process reward |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Bag of Tricks for Inference-time Computation of LLM Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Bag of Tricks for Inference-time Computation of LLM Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 2.8objective alignment · 2.0negative sampling · 2.0graph contrastive learning · 2.0self-evaluation · 0.9best-of-n · 0.9RLHF reward · 0.9MCTS · 0.9recurrent summarization · 0.8hypernetwork · 0.8hierarchical summarization · 0.8hierarchical graph learning · 0.8graph encoder-decoder · 0.8LoRA · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Hard vs. Noise: Resolving Hard-Noisy Sample Confusion in Recommender Systems via Large Language ModelsabstractImplicit feedback, employed in training recommender systems, unavoidably confronts noise due to factors such as misclicks and position bias. Previous studies have attempted to identify noisy samples through their diverged data patterns, such as higher loss values, and mitigate their influence through sample dropping or reweighting. However, we observed that noisy samples and hard samples display similar patterns, leading to hard-noisy confusion issue. Such confusion is problematic as hard samples are vital for modeling user preferences. To solve this problem, we propose LLMHNI framework, leveraging two auxiliary user-item relevance signals generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) to differentiate hard and noisy samples. LLMHNI obtains user-item semantic relevance from LLM-encoded embeddings, which is used in negative sampling to select hard negatives while filtering out noisy false negatives. An objective alignment strategy is proposed to project LLM-encoded embeddings, originally for general language tasks, into a representation space optimized for user-item relevance modeling. LLMHNI also exploits LLM-inferred logical relevance within user-item interactions to identify hard and noisy samples. These LLM-inferred interactions are integrated into the interaction graph and guide denoising with cross-graph contrastive alignment. To eliminate the impact of unreliable interactions induced by LLM hallucination, we propose a graph contrastive learning strategy that aligns representations from randomly edge-dropped views to suppress unreliable edges. Empirical results demonstrate that LLMHNI significantly improves denoising and recommendation performance. Tianrui Song, Wenshuo Chao, Hao Liu 0026 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | Bag of Tricks for Inference-time Computation of LLM ReasoningabstractWith the advancement of large language models (LLMs), solving complex tasks (e.g., math problems, code generation, etc.) has garnered increasing attention. Inference-time computation methods (e.g., Best-of-N, MCTS, etc.) are of significant importance, as they have the potential to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs without requiring external training computation. However, due to the inherent challenges of this technique, most existing methods remain proof-of-concept and are not yet sufficiently effective. In this paper, we investigate and benchmark strategies for improving inference-time computation across a wide range of reasoning tasks. Since most current methods rely on a pipeline that first generates candidate solutions (e.g., generating chain-of-thought candidate solutions) and then selects them based on specific reward signals (e.g., RLHF reward, process reward, etc.), our research focuses on strategies for both candidate solution generation (e.g., instructing prompts, hyperparameters: temperature and top-p, etc.) and reward mechanisms (e.g., self-evaluation, reward types, etc.). The experimental results reveal that several previously overlooked strategies can be critical for the success of inference-time computation (e.g., simplifying the temperature can improve general reasoning task performance by up to 5%). Based on extensive experiments (more than 20,000 A100-80G GPU hours with over 1,000 experiments) across a variety of models (e.g., Llama, Qwen, and Mistral families) of various sizes, our proposed strategies outperform the baseline by a substantial margin in most cases, providing a stronger foundation for future research. Fan Liu 0011, Wenshuo Chao, Naiqiang Tan, Hao Liu 0026 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | A Cross-View Hierarchical Graph Learning Hypernetwork for Skill Demand-Supply Joint PredictionabstractThe rapidly changing landscape of technology and industries leads to dynamic skill requirements, making it crucial for employees and employers to anticipate such shifts to maintain a competitive edge in the labor market. Existing efforts in this area either relies on domain-expert knowledge or regarding the skill evolution as a simplified time series forecasting problem. However, both approaches overlook the sophisticated relationships among different skills and the inner-connection between skill demand and supply variations. In this paper, we propose a Cross-view Hierarchical Graph learning Hypernetwork (CHGH) framework for joint skill demand-supply prediction. Specifically, CHGH is an encoder-decoder network consisting of i) a cross-view graph encoder to capture the interconnection between skill demand and supply, ii) a hierarchical graph encoder to model the co-evolution of skills from a cluster-wise perspective, and iii) a conditional hyper-decoder to jointly predict demand and supply variations by incorporating historical demand-supply gaps. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed framework compared to seven baselines and the effectiveness of the three modules. Wenshuo Chao, Zhaopeng Qiu, Likang Wu, Zhuoning Guo, Zhi Zheng 0008, Hengshu Zhu, Hao Liu 0026 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Harnessing Large Language Models for Text-Rich Sequential RecommendationabstractRecent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have been changing the paradigm of Recommender Systems (RS). However, when items in the recommendation scenarios contain rich textual information, such as product descriptions in online shopping or news headlines on social media, LLMs require longer texts to comprehensively depict the historical user behavior sequence. This poses significant challenges to LLM-based recommenders, such as over-length limitations, extensive time and space overheads, and suboptimal model performance. To this end, in this paper, we design a novel framework for harnessing Large Language Models for Text-Rich Sequential Recommendation (LLM-TRSR). Specifically, we first propose to segment the user historical behaviors and subsequently employ an LLM-based summarizer for summarizing these user behavior blocks. Particularly, drawing inspiration from the successful application of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) models in user modeling, we introduce two unique summarization techniques in this paper, respectively hierarchical summarization and recurrent summarization. Then, we construct a prompt text encompassing the user preference summary, recent user interactions, and candidate item information into an LLM-based recommender, which is subsequently fine-tuned using Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) techniques to yield our final recommendation model. We also use Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT). We conduct experiments on two public datasets, and the results clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Zhi Zheng 0008, Wenshuo Chao, Zhaopeng Qiu, Hengshu Zhu, Hui Xiong 0001 |
WWW | 2 |