Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mahadev Prasad Panda

dblp:367/6154 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Deep learning architectures and training · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
FovEx: Human-Inspired Explanations for Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer
0.912025
FovEx: Human-Inspired Explanations for Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
visual explanation
0.912025
FovEx: Human-Inspired Explanations for Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient-driven attention · 0.9foveation-based transformation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 TreeNet: A Light Weight Model for Low Bitrate Image Compression
Mahadev Prasad Panda, Purnachandra Rao Makkena, Srivatsa Prativadibhayankaram, Siegfried Fößel, André Kaup
PCS1
2025 FovEx: Human-Inspired Explanations for Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks
abstract
Abstract Explainability in artificial intelligence (XAI) remains a crucial aspect for fostering trust and understanding in machine learning models. Current visual explanation techniques, such as gradient-based or class-activation-based methods, often exhibit a strong dependence on specific model architectures. Conversely, perturbation-based methods, despite being model-agnostic, are computationally expensive as they require evaluating models on a large number of forward passes. We introduce Foveation-based Explanations (FovEx), a novel XAI method inspired by human vision, which combines biologically inspired foveation-based transformations with gradient-driven overt attention to iteratively select locations of interest. These locations are selected to maximize the performance of the model to be explained with respect to the downstream task and then combined to generate an attribution map. We provide a thorough evaluation with qualitative and quantitative assessments on established benchmarks. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on both transformers (on 4 out of 5 metrics) and convolutional models (on 3 out of 5 metrics), demonstrating its versatility among various architectures. Furthermore, we show the alignment between the explanation map produced by FovEx and human gaze patterns (+14% in NSS compared to RISE, +203% in NSS compared to GradCAM). This comparison enhances our confidence in FovEx’s ability to close the interpretation gap between humans and machines.
Mahadev Prasad Panda, Matteo Tiezzi, Martina G. Vilas, Gemma Roig, Björn M. Eskofier, Dario Zanca
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
2025 Correction: FovEx: Human-Inspired Explanations for Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks
abstract
Correction: International Journal of Computer Vision (2025) 133:7437–7459
Mahadev Prasad Panda, Matteo Tiezzi, Martina G. Vilas, Gemma Roig, Björn M. Eskofier, Dario Zanca
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
2024 SLIC: A Learned Image Codec Using Structure and Color
abstract
We propose the structure and color based learned image codec (SLIC) in which the task of compression is split into that of luminance and chrominance. The deep learning model is built with a novel multi-scale architecture for Y and UV channels in the encoder, where the features from various stages are combined to obtain the latent representation. An autoregressive context model is employed for backward adaptation and a hyperprior block for forward adaptation. Various experiments are carried out to study and analyze the performance of the proposed model, and to compare it with other image codecs. We also illustrate the advantages of our method through the visualization of channel impulse responses, latent channels and various ablation studies. The model achieves Bjøntegaard delta bitrate gains of 7.5% and 4.66% in terms of MS-SSIM and CIEDE2000 metrics with respect to other state-of-the-art reference codecs.
Srivatsa Prativadibhayankaram, Mahadev Prasad Panda, Thomas Richter 0005, Heiko Sparenberg, Siegfried Fößel, André Kaup
DCC2
2024 A Study on the Effect of Color Spaces in Learned Image Compression
abstract
In this work, we present a comparison between color spaces namely YUV, LAB, RGB and their effect on learned image compression. For this we use the structure and color based learned image codec (SLIC) from our prior work, which consists of two branches - one for the luminance component (Y or L) and another for chrominance components (UV or AB). However, for the RGB variant we input all 3 channels in a single branch, similar to most learned image codecs operating in RGB. The models are trained for multiple bitrate configurations in each color space. We report the findings from our experiments by evaluating them on various datasets and compare the results to state-of-the-art image codecs. The YUV model performs better than the LAB variant in terms of MSSSIM with a Bjøntegaard delta bitrate (BD-BR) gain of 7.5% using VTM intra-coding mode as the baseline. Whereas the LAB variant has a better performance than YUV model in terms of CIEDE2000 having a BD-BR gain of 8%. Overall, the RGB variant of SLIC achieves the best performance with a BD-BR gain of 13.14% in terms of MS-SSIM and a gain of 17.96% in CIEDE2000 at the cost of a higher model complexity.
Srivatsa Prativadibhayankaram, Mahadev Prasad Panda, Jürgen Seiler, Thomas Richter 0005, Heiko Sparenberg, Siegfried Fößel, André Kaup
ICIP2