EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lucas Saldyt
dblp:367/7102
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 44% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 22% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 22% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
global localization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Censible: A Robust and Practical Global Localization Framework for Planetary Surface Missions · ICRA 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Position: LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworks · ICML 2024 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › robot localization
planetary rover localization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Censible: A Robust and Practical Global Localization Framework for Planetary Surface Missions · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
feature matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Censible: A Robust and Practical Global Localization Framework for Planetary Surface Missions · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neuro-symbolic integration · 0.8model-based verification · 0.8census transform · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Position: LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo FrameworksabstractWe argue that auto-regressive LLMs cannot, by themselves, do planning or self-verification (which is after all a form of reasoning), and shed some light on the reasons for misunderstandings in the literature. We will also argue that LLMs should be viewed as universal approximate knowledge sources that have much more meaningful roles to play in planning/reasoning tasks beyond simple front-end/back-end format translators. We present a vision of LLM-Modulo Frameworks that combine the strengths of LLMs with external model-based verifiers in a tighter bi-directional interaction regime. We will show how the models driving the external verifiers themselves can be acquired with the help of LLMs. We will also argue that rather than simply pipelining LLMs and symbolic components, this LLM-Modulo Framework provides a better neuro-symbolic approach that offers tighter integration between LLMs and symbolic components, and allows extending the scope of model-based planning/reasoning regimes towards more flexible knowledge, problem and preference specifications. Subbarao Kambhampati, Karthik Valmeekam, Lin Guan 0003, Mudit Verma, Kaya Stechly, Siddhant Bhambri, Lucas Saldyt, Anil Murthy |
ICML | 7 |
| 2024 | Censible: A Robust and Practical Global Localization Framework for Planetary Surface MissionsabstractTo achieve longer driving distances, planetary robotics missions require accurate localization to counteract position uncertainty. Freedom and precision in driving allows scientists to reach and study sites of interest. Typically, rover global localization has been performed manually by humans, which is accurate but time-consuming as data is relayed between planets. This paper describes a global localization algorithm that is run onboard the Perseverance Mars rover. Our approach matches rover images to orbital maps using a modified census transform to achieve sub-meter accurate, near-human localization performance on a real dataset of 264 Mars rover panoramas. The proposed solution has also been successfully executed on the Perseverance Mars Rover, demonstrating the practicality of our approach. Jeremy Nash, Quintin Dwight, Lucas Saldyt, Haoda Wang, Steven Myint, Adnan Ansar, Vandi Verma |
ICRA | 3 |