Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Parsa Hejabi

dblp:367/7229 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Trustworthy machine learning · 30% Language models and text generation · 30%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.012026
Flip-Flop Consistency: Unsupervised Training for Robustness to Prompt Perturbations in LLMs · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
subjectivity analysis
1.012026
The Subjectivity of Respect in Police Traffic Stops: Modeling Community Perspectives in Body-Worn Camera Footage · ACL (1) 2026
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
video annotation
0.812024
CVAT-BWV: A Web-Based Video Annotation Platform for Police Body-Worn Video · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation matching
feature alignment
0.312026
Flip-Flop Consistency: Unsupervised Training for Robustness to Prompt Perturbations in LLMs · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 2.0unsupervised training · 1.0majority voting · 1.0consensus cross-entropy · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 The Subjectivity of Respect in Police Traffic Stops: Modeling Community Perspectives in Body-Worn Camera Footage
abstract
Preni Golazizian, Elnaz Rahmati, Jackson Trager, Zhivar Sourati, Nona Ghazizadeh, Georgios Chochlakis, Jose J. Alcocer, Kerby Bennett, Aarya Vijay Devnani, Parsa Hejabi, Harry G. Muttram, Akshay Kiran Padte, Mehrshad Saadatinia, Chenhao Wu, Alireza Salkhordeh Ziabari, Michael Sierra-Arévalo, Nicholas Weller, Shrikanth Narayanan, Benjamin A.t. Graham, Morteza Dehghani. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Preni Golazizian, Elnaz Rahmati, Jackson Trager, Zhivar Sourati, Nona Ghazizadeh, Georgios Chochlakis, Jose Alcocer, Kerby Bennett, Aarya Vijay Devnani, Parsa Hejabi, Harry G. Muttram, Akshay Kiran Padte, Mehrshad Saadatinia, Alireza S. Ziabari, Michael Sierra-Arévalo, Nicholas Weller, Shri Narayanan, Benjamin A. T. Graham, Morteza Dehghani
ACL (1)10
2026 Flip-Flop Consistency: Unsupervised Training for Robustness to Prompt Perturbations in LLMs
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce inconsistent answers when faced with different phrasings of the same prompt.In this paper, we propose Flip-Flop Consistency (F 2 C), an unsupervised training method that improves robustness to such perturbations.F 2 C is composed of two key components.The first, Consensus Cross-Entropy (CCE), uses a majority vote across prompt variations to create a hard pseudo-label.The second is a representation alignment loss that pulls lower-confidence and non-majority predictors toward the consensus established by high-confidence, majorityvoting variations.We evaluate our method on 11 datasets spanning four NLP tasks, with 4-15 prompt variations per dataset.On average, F 2 C raises observed agreement by 11.62%, improves mean F 1 by 8.94%, and reduces performance variance across formats by 3.29%.In out-of-domain evaluations, F 2 C generalizes effectively, increasing F 1 and agreement while decreasing variance across most source-target pairs.Finally, when trained on only a subset of prompt perturbations and evaluated on held-out formats, F 2 C consistently improves both performance and agreement while reducing variance.These findings highlight F 2 C as an effective unsupervised method for enhancing LLM consistency, performance, and generalization under prompt perturbations. 1
Parsa Hejabi, Elnaz Rahmati, Alireza S. Ziabari, Morteza Dehghani
ACL (1)1
2024 CVAT-BWV: A Web-Based Video Annotation Platform for Police Body-Worn Video
Parsa Hejabi, Akshay Kiran Padte, Preni Golazizian, Rajat Hebbar, Jackson Trager, Georgios Chochlakis, Aditya Kommineni, Ellie Graeden, Shri Narayanan, Benjamin A. T. Graham, Morteza Dehghani
IJCAI1
2024 Reinforced Multiple Instance Selection for Speaker Attribute Prediction
abstract
Alireza Salkhordeh Ziabari, Ali Omrani, Parsa Hejabi, Preni Golazizian, Brendan Kennedy, Payam Piray, Morteza Dehghani. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Alireza S. Ziabari, Ali Omrani, Parsa Hejabi, Preni Golazizian, Brendan Kennedy 0001, Payam Piray, Morteza Dehghani
NAACL-HLT3