Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zishi Zhang
dblp:367/8971
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 44% Deep learning architectures and training · 14% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring and Exploiting Model Uncertainty in Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training › local learning
forward learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FLOPS: Forward Learning with OPtimal Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FLOPS: Forward Learning with OPtimal Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
model uncertainty |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring and Exploiting Model Uncertainty in Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring and Exploiting Model Uncertainty in Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FLOPS: Forward Learning with OPtimal Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
cross-modal alignment |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FLOPS: Forward Learning with OPtimal Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FLOPS: Forward Learning with OPtimal Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompt tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FLOPS: Forward Learning with OPtimal Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thompson sampling · 0.9reparameterization · 0.9monte carlo sampling · 0.9gaussian process · 0.9dirichlet process mixture · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Robust Dwell Time Allocation for Multiple Ballistic Reentry Target Tracking in Phased Array RadarabstractPhased array radar (PAR) is shown to provide an enhanced performance for target tracking due to its beam agility and ability for time resource allocation. Existing algorithms for PAR resource allocation often consider standard and simplified dynamic models for target motion, which are not suitable for complex scenarios such as for ballistic target tracking. To expand the applications of resource allocation algorithms in this context, this paper proposes a robust dwell time allocation algorithm for multiple ballistic reentry target (BRT) tracking in PAR. We aim to achieve an online dwell time allocation by establishing and solving optimization problems at each tracking interval. The motion of BRT is characterized by using the flat earth model, and the predicted Cramér-Rao lower bound (PCRLB) for BRT is derived to quantify the performance of tracking. By minimizing the weighted sum of time consumption of the PAR and cost of attaining the desired performance, a robust dwell time allocation approach is established. Finally, the superiority of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated through simulation. Zishi Zhang, Ye Yuan 0015, Wei Yi 0002, Pramod K. Varshney |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2025 | FLOPS: Forward Learning with OPtimal SamplingabstractGiven the limitations of backpropagation, perturbation-based gradient computation methods have recently gained focus for learning with only forward passes, also referred to as queries. Conventional forward learning consumes enormous queries on each data point for accurate gradient estimation through Monte Carlo sampling, which hinders the scalability of those algorithms. However, not all data points deserve equal queries for gradient estimation. In this paper, we study the problem of improving the forward learning efficiency from a novel perspective: how to reduce the gradient estimation variance with minimum cost? For this, we allocate the optimal number of queries within a set budget during training to balance estimation accuracy and computational efficiency. Specifically, with a simplified proxy objective and a reparameterization technique, we derive a novel plug-and-play query allocator with minimal parameters. Theoretical results are carried out to verify its optimality. We conduct extensive experiments for fine-tuning Vision Transformers on various datasets and further deploy the allocator to two black-box applications: prompt tuning and multimodal alignment for foundation models. All findings demonstrate that our proposed allocator significantly enhances the scalability of forward-learning algorithms, paving the way for real-world applications. The implementation is available at https://github.com/RTkenny/FLOPS-Forward-Learning-with-OPtimal-Sampling. Tao Ren 0006, Zishi Zhang, Jinyang Jiang 0001, Zeliang Zhang 0001, Mingqian Feng, Yijie Peng |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Exploring and Exploiting Model Uncertainty in Bayesian OptimizationabstractIn this work, we consider the problem of Bayesian Optimization (BO) under reward model uncertainty—that is, when the underlying distribution type of the reward is unknown and potentially intractable to specify.
This challenge is particularly evident in many modern applications, where the reward distribution is highly ill-behaved, often non-stationary, multi-modal, or heavy-tailed.
In such settings, classical Gaussian Process (GP)-based BO methods often fail due to their strong modeling assumptions.
To address this challenge, we propose a novel surrogate model, the infinity-Gaussian Process ($\infty$-GP), which represents a sequential spatial Dirichlet Process mixture with a GP baseline. The $\infty$-GP quantifies both value uncertainty and model uncertainty, enabling more flexible modeling of complex reward structures. Combined with Thompson Sampling, the $\infty$-GP facilitates principled exploration and exploitation in the distributional space of reward models. Theoretically, we prove that the $\infty$-GP surrogate model can approximate a broad class of reward distributions by effectively exploring the distribution space, achieving near-minimax-optimal posterior contraction rates. Empirically, our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in various challenging scenarios, including highly non-stationary and heavy-tailed reward settings where classical GP-based BO often fails. Zishi Zhang, Tao Ren 0006, Yijie Peng |
NeurIPS | 1 |