Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chufan Chen
dblp:367/9199
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › offline reinforcement learning
conditional sequence modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rebalancing Return Coverage for Conditional Sequence Modeling in Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rebalancing Return Coverage for Conditional Sequence Modeling in Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weighted sampling · 0.9value regularization · 0.9return rebalancing · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Rebalancing Return Coverage for Conditional Sequence Modeling in Offline Reinforcement LearningabstractRecent advancements in offline reinforcement learning (RL) have underscored the capabilities of conditional sequence modeling (CSM), a paradigm that models the action distribution conditioned on both historical trajectories and target returns associated with each state. However, due to the imbalanced return distribution caused by suboptimal datasets, CSM is grappling with a serious distributional shift problem when conditioning on high returns. While recent approaches attempt to empirically tackle this challenge through return rebalancing techniques such as weighted sampling and value-regularized supervision, the relationship between return rebalancing and the performance of CSM methods is not well understood. In this paper, we reveal that both expert-level and full-spectrum return-coverage critically influence the performance and sample efficiency of CSM policies. Building on this finding, we devise a simple yet effective return-coverage rebalancing mechanism that can be seamlessly integrated into common CSM frameworks, including the most widely used one, Decision Transformer (DT). The resulting CSM algorithm, referred to as Return-rebalanced Value-regularized Decision Transformer (RVDT), integrates both implicit and explicit return-coverage rebalancing mechanisms, and achieves state-of-the-art performance in the D4RL experiments. Wensong Bai, Chufan Chen, Yichao Fu, Qihang Xu, Chao Zhang 0029, Hui Qian 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |