Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sergei Kholkin

dblp:367/9264 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.522024
Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Light and Optimal Schrödinger Bridge Matching · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
denoising diffusion GAN
0.812024
Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
domain translation
0.812024
Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.812024
Light and Optimal Schrödinger Bridge Matching · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.812024
Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
schrödinger bridge
0.812024
Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion bridge
schrödinger bridge matching
0.812024
Light and Optimal Schrödinger Bridge Matching · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network › image-to-image translation
unsupervised image-to-image translation
0.812024
Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
entropic optimal transport
0.212024
Light and Optimal Schrödinger Bridge Matching · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.212024
Light and Optimal Schrödinger Bridge Matching · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gaussian mixture parameterization · 1.5energy-based modeling · 1.5bridge matching · 1.5discrete-time markovian fitting · 0.8adversarial training · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Light and Optimal Schrödinger Bridge Matching
abstract
Schrödinger Bridges (SB) have recently gained the attention of the ML community as a promising extension of classic diffusion models which is also interconnected to the Entropic Optimal Transport (EOT). Recent solvers for SB exploit the pervasive bridge matching procedures. Such procedures aim to recover a stochastic process transporting the mass between distributions given only a transport plan between them. In particular, given the EOT plan, these procedures can be adapted to solve SB. This fact is heavily exploited by recent works giving rives to matching-based SB solvers. The cornerstone here is recovering the EOT plan: recent works either use heuristical approximations (e.g., the minibatch OT) or establish iterative matching procedures which by the design accumulate the error during the training. We address these limitations and propose a novel procedure to learn SB which we call the optimal Schrödinger bridge matching. It exploits the optimal parameterization of the diffusion process and provably recovers the SB process (a) with a single bridge matching step and (b) with arbitrary transport plan as the input. Furthermore, we show that the optimal bridge matching objective coincides with the recently discovered energy-based modeling (EBM) objectives to learn EOT/SB. Inspired by this observation, we develop a light solver (which we call LightSB-M) to implement optimal matching in practice using the Gaussian mixture parameterization of the adjusted Schrödinger potential. We experimentally showcase the performance of our solver in a range of practical tasks.
Nikita Gushchin, Sergei Kholkin, Evgeny Burnaev, Alexander Korotin
ICML2
2024 Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching
abstract
The Schrödinger Bridge (SB) problem offers a powerful framework for combining optimal transport and diffusion models. A promising recent approach to solve the SB problem is the Iterative Markovian Fitting (IMF) procedure, which alternates between Markovian and reciprocal projections of continuous-time stochastic processes. However, the model built by the IMF procedure has a long inference time due to using many steps of numerical solvers for stochastic differential equations. To address this limitation, we propose a novel Discrete-time IMF (D-IMF) procedure in which learning of stochastic processes is replaced by learning just a few transition probabilities in discrete time. Its great advantage is that in practice it can be naturally implemented using the Denoising Diffusion GAN (DD-GAN), an already well-established adversarial generative modeling technique. We show that our D-IMF procedure can provide the same quality of unpaired domain translation as the IMF, using only several generation steps instead of hundreds.
Nikita Gushchin, Daniil Selikhanovych, Sergei Kholkin, Evgeny Burnaev, Alexander Korotin
NeurIPS3