Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sébastien Levieux

dblp:367/9498 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 83% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 17%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
mixed-criticality scheduling
0.712023
Work-In-Progress: Could Tensorflow Applications Benefit from a Mixed-Criticality Approach? · RTSS 2023
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
multicore scheduling
0.712023
Work-In-Progress: Could Tensorflow Applications Benefit from a Mixed-Criticality Approach? · RTSS 2023
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.712023
Work-In-Progress: Could Tensorflow Applications Benefit from a Mixed-Criticality Approach? · RTSS 2023
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
CNN accelerator
0.212023
Work-In-Progress: Could Tensorflow Applications Benefit from a Mixed-Criticality Approach? · RTSS 2023
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator
0.212023
Work-In-Progress: Could Tensorflow Applications Benefit from a Mixed-Criticality Approach? · RTSS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

partitioning · 0.7measurement campaign · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Work-In-Progress: Could Tensorflow Applications Benefit from a Mixed-Criticality Approach?
abstract
In this article, we investigate the interest in applying a mixed-criticality approach to schedule convolutional neural network (CNN) applications on multicore architectures. We deal with software composed of real-time interactive applications and CNNs that have different criticality levels. A classical means to schedule software with various criticality levels is to apply partitioning methods to enforce spatial and temporal isolation, which may be inefficient if application execution times have a high level of variability. In that case, applying a mixed-criticality approach may improve resource usage. We conducted a measurement campaign to assess the variability of CNN execution time and investigate whether this kind of application could benefit from a mixed-criticality approach. The results show that the execution times of the chosen CNN application vary with an average execution time of 109 ms and a worst case of 252 ms. Furthermore, they indicate a potential save of computing resources up to 73 % when applying a mixed-criticality approach instead of partitioning methods.
Alan Le Boudec, Frank Singhoff, Hai Nam Tran, Stéphane Rubini, Sébastien Levieux, Alexandre Skrzyniarz
RTSS5