Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sanghyun Byun
dblp:368/3161
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-2149-5770ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 44% Learning theory · 44% Generative modeling · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
minimum description length |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Single-pass Adaptive Image Tokenization for Minimum Program Search · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
visual representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Single-pass Adaptive Image Tokenization for Minimum Program Search · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image tokenization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Single-pass Adaptive Image Tokenization for Minimum Program Search · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.9one-shot tokenization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | AI automation for material consistency in industrial 3D assets
Sanghyun Byun, Eric Sterner, Joshua Milburn, Keunhae Ushiroda, Eric Boise, David Olsen, Jacob Song, Woo Seong Chung |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 1 |
| 2025 | Single-pass Adaptive Image Tokenization for Minimum Program SearchabstractAccording to Algorithmic Information Theory (AIT), intelligent representations compress data into the shortest possible program while remaining predictive of its content—exhibiting low Kolmogorov Complexity (KC). In contrast, most visual representation learning systems assign fixed-length representations to all inputs, ignoring variations in complexity or familiarity. Recent adaptive tokenization methods address this by allocating variable-length representations but typically require test-time search over multiple hypotheses to identify the most predictive one. Inspired by KC principles, we propose a one-shot adaptive tokenizer, KARL, that predicts the appropriate number of tokens for an image in a single forward pass, halting once its approximate KC is reached. The token count serves as a proxy for the minimum description length. KARL performs comparably to recent adaptive tokenizers while operating in a one-pass manner. Additionally, we present a conceptual study showing a correlation between adaptive tokenization and core ideas from AIT. We demonstrate that adaptive tokenization not only aligns with KC but also reveals empirical signals approximating AIT concepts such as sophistication and logical depth. Finally, we analyze predicted image complexity and interestingness across axes such as structure vs. noise and in-distribution vs. out-of-distribution familiarity, highlighting alignment with human annotations. Shivam Duggal, Sanghyun Byun, William T. Freeman, Antonio Torralba 0001, Phillip Isola |
NeurIPS | 2 |