Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stephen Zhewen Lu
dblp:368/3488
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Generative modeling · 45% Language models and text generation · 25% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 16% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Aligning Protein Conformation Ensemble Generation with Physical Feedback · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
experimental design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Measuring Scientific Capabilities of Language Models with a Systems Biology Dry Lab · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
LLM agent evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Measuring Scientific Capabilities of Language Models with a Systems Biology Dry Lab · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › protein design
protein structure generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Aligning Protein Conformation Ensemble Generation with Physical Feedback · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics › protein conformational analysis
protein conformation generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Structure Language Models for Protein Conformation Generation · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Aligning Protein Conformation Ensemble Generation with Physical Feedback · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Structure Language Models for Protein Conformation Generation · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Aligning Protein Conformation Ensemble Generation with Physical Feedback · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
systems biology |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Measuring Scientific Capabilities of Language Models with a Systems Biology Dry Lab · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | QGFN: Controllable Greediness with Action Values · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Structure Language Models for Protein Conformation Generation · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › language model architecture
structured language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Structure Language Models for Protein Conformation Generation · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
systems biology markup language · 1.7simulated data generation · 1.7physical feedback · 1.7masked diffusion · 1.7energy-based alignment · 1.7discrete variational autoencoder · 1.7ESM3 · 1.7reinforcement learning · 0.8action-value estimation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Structure Language Models for Protein Conformation GenerationabstractProteins adopt multiple structural conformations to perform their diverse biological functions, and understanding these conformations is crucial for advancing drug discovery. Traditional physics-based simulation methods often struggle with sampling equilibrium conformations and are computationally expensive. Recently, deep generative models have shown promise in generating protein conformations as a more efficient alternative. However, these methods predominantly rely on the diffusion process within a 3D geometric space, which typically centers around the vicinity of metastable states and is often inefficient in terms of runtime. In this paper, we introduce Structure Language Modeling (SLM) as a novel framework for efficient protein conformation generation. Specifically, the protein structures are first encoded into a compact latent space using a discrete variational auto-encoder, followed by conditional language modeling that effectively captures sequence-specific conformation distributions. This enables a more efficient and interpretable exploration of diverse ensemble modes compared to existing methods. Based on this general framework, we instantiate SLM with various popular LM architectures as well as proposing the ESMDiff, a novel BERT-like structure language model fine-tuned from ESM3 with masked diffusion. We verify our approach in various scenarios, including the equilibrium dynamics of BPTI, conformational change pairs, and intrinsically disordered proteins. SLM provides a highly efficient solution, offering a 20-100x speedup than existing methods in generating diverse conformations, shedding light on promising avenues for future research. Jiarui Lu, Xiaoyin Chen, Stephen Zhewen Lu, Chence Shi, Yoshua Bengio, Jian Tang 0005 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2025 | Aligning Protein Conformation Ensemble Generation with Physical FeedbackabstractProtein dynamics play a crucial role in protein biological functions and properties, and their traditional study typically relies on time-consuming molecular dynamics (MD) simulations conducted in silico. Recent advances in generative modeling, particularly denoising diffusion models, have enabled efficient accurate protein structure prediction and conformation sampling by learning distributions over crystallographic structures. However, effectively integrating physical supervision into these data-driven approaches remains challenging, as standard energy-based objectives often lead to intractable optimization. In this paper, we introduce Energy-based Alignment (EBA), a method that aligns generative models with feedback from physical models, efficiently calibrating them to appropriately balance conformational states based on their energy differences. Experimental results on the MD ensemble benchmark demonstrate that EBA achieves state-of-the-art performance in generating high-quality protein ensembles. By improving the physical plausibility of generated structures, our approach enhances model predictions and holds promise for applications in structural biology and drug discovery. Jiarui Lu, Xiaoyin Chen, Stephen Zhewen Lu, Aurélie C. Lozano, Vijil Chenthamarakshan, Jian Tang 0005 |
ICML | 3 |
| 2025 | Measuring Scientific Capabilities of Language Models with a Systems Biology Dry LababstractDesigning experiments and result interpretations are core scientific competencies, particularly in biology, where researchers perturb complex systems to uncover the underlying systems. Recent efforts to evaluate the scientific capabilities of large language models (LLMs) fail to test these competencies because wet-lab experimentation is prohibitively expensive: in expertise, time and equipment. We introduce SciGym, a first-in-class benchmark that assesses LLMs' iterative experiment design and analysis abilities in open-ended scientific discovery tasks. SciGym overcomes the challenge of wet-lab costs by running a dry lab of biological systems. These models, encoded in Systems Biology Markup Language, are efficient for generating simulated data, making them ideal testbeds for experimentation on realistically complex systems. We evaluated six frontier LLMs on 137 small systems, and released a total of 350 systems at https://huggingface.co/datasets/h4duan/scigym-sbml. Our evaluation shows that while more capable models demonstrated superior performance, all models' performance declined significantly as system complexity increased, suggesting substantial room for improvement in the scientific capabilities of LLM agents. Haonan Duan 0002, Stephen Zhewen Lu, Caitlin F. Harrigan, Nishkrit Desai, Jiarui Lu, Michal Koziarski, Leonardo Cotta, Chris J. Maddison |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | QGFN: Controllable Greediness with Action ValuesabstractGenerative Flow Networks (GFlowNets; GFNs) are a family of energy-based generative methods for combinatorial objects, capable of generating diverse and high-utility samples. However, consistently biasing GFNs towards producing high-utility samples is non-trivial. In this work, we leverage connections between GFNs and reinforcement learning (RL) and propose to combine the GFN policy with an action-value estimate, $Q$, to create greedier sampling policies which can be controlled by a mixing parameter. We show that several variants of the proposed method, QGFN, are able to improve on the number of high-reward samples generated in a variety of tasks without sacrificing diversity. Elaine Lau, Stephen Zhewen Lu, Ling Pan, Doina Precup, Emmanuel Bengio |
NeurIPS | 2 |