Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sobihan Surendran

dblp:368/5113 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 35% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 35% Optimization for machine learning · 30%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Wasserstein Convergence of Critically Damped Langevin Diffusions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
langevin dynamics
0.912025
Wasserstein Convergence of Critically Damped Langevin Diffusions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling
0.912025
Wasserstein Convergence of Critically Damped Langevin Diffusions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model
0.912025
Wasserstein Convergence of Critically Damped Langevin Diffusions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
0.812024
Non-asymptotic Analysis of Biased Adaptive Stochastic Approximation · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization
0.812024
Non-asymptotic Analysis of Biased Adaptive Stochastic Approximation · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic approximation
0.812024
Non-asymptotic Analysis of Biased Adaptive Stochastic Approximation · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adam · 1.5adagrad · 1.5RMSProp · 1.5wasserstein metric · 0.9statistical mechanics · 0.9AMSGrad · 0.8AMSGRAD · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Theoretical Convergence Guarantees for Variational Autoencoders
abstract
Variational Autoencoders (VAE) are popular generative models used to sample from complex data distributions. Despite their empirical success in various machine learning tasks, significant gaps remain in understanding their theoretical properties, particularly regarding convergence guarantees. This paper aims to bridge that gap by providing non-asymptotic convergence guarantees for VAE trained using both Stochastic Gradient Descent and Adam algorithms. We derive a convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}(\log n / \sqrt{n})$, where $n$ is the number of iterations of the optimization algorithm, with explicit dependencies on the batch size, the number of variational samples, and other key hyperparameters. Our theoretical analysis applies to both Linear VAE and Deep Gaussian VAE, as well as several VAE variants, including $\beta$-VAE and IWAE. Additionally, we empirically illustrate the impact of hyperparameters on convergence, offering new insights into the theoretical understanding of VAE training.
Sobihan Surendran, Antoine Godichon-Baggioni, Sylvain Le Corff
AISTATS1
2025 Wasserstein Convergence of Critically Damped Langevin Diffusions
abstract
Score-based Generative Models (SGMs) have achieved impressive performance in data generation across a wide range of applications and benefit from strong theoretical guarantees. Recently, methods inspired by statistical mechanics, in particular, Hamiltonian dynamics, have introduced Critically-damped Langevin Diffusions (CLDs), which define diffusion processes on extended spaces by coupling the data with auxiliary variables. These approaches, along with their associated score-matching and sampling procedures, have been shown to outperform standard diffusion-based samplers numerically. In this paper, we analyze a generalized dynamic that extends classical CLDs by introducing an additional hyperparameter controlling the noise applied to the data coordinate, thereby better exploiting the extended space. We further derive a novel upper bound on the sampling error of CLD-based generative models in the Wasserstein metric. This additional hyperparameter influences the smoothness of sample paths, and our discretization error analysis provides practical guidance for its tuning, leading to improved sampling performance.
Stanislas Strasman, Sobihan Surendran, Claire Boyer, Sylvain Le Corff, Vincent Lemaire 0002, Antonio Ocello
NeurIPS2
2024 Non-asymptotic Analysis of Biased Adaptive Stochastic Approximation
abstract
Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) with adaptive steps is widely used to train deep neural networks and generative models. Most theoretical results assume that it is possible to obtain unbiased gradient estimators, which is not the case in several recent deep learning and reinforcement learning applications that use Monte Carlo methods. This paper provides a comprehensive non-asymptotic analysis of SGD with biased gradients and adaptive steps for non-convex smooth functions. Our study incorporates time-dependent bias and emphasizes the importance of controlling the bias of the gradient estimator. In particular, we establish that Adagrad, RMSProp, and AMSGRAD, an exponential moving average variant of Adam, with biased gradients, converge to critical points for smooth non-convex functions at a rate similar to existing results in the literature for the unbiased case. Finally, we provide experimental results using Variational Autoenconders (VAE) and applications to several learning frameworks that illustrate our convergence results and show how the effect of bias can be reduced by appropriate hyperparameter tuning.
Sobihan Surendran, Adeline Fermanian, Antoine Godichon-Baggioni, Sylvain Le Corff
NeurIPS1