Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiaobao Huang
dblp:368/5255
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-1679-3888ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 67% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CrochetBench: Can Vision-Language Models Move from Describing to Doing in Crochet Domain? · ACL (1) 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
procedural reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CrochetBench: Can Vision-Language Models Move from Describing to Doing in Crochet Domain? · ACL (1) 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CrochetBench: Can Vision-Language Models Move from Describing to Doing in Crochet Domain? · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
execution-based evaluation · 1.0domain-specific language intermediate representation · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CrochetBench: Can Vision-Language Models Move from Describing to Doing in Crochet Domain?abstractWhile multimodal large language models can describe visual content, their ability to generate executable procedures remains underexplored.CrochetBench presented in this paper evaluates this shift from describing to doing through fine-grained procedural reasoning in crochet: models must recognize stitches, select structurally appropriate instructions, and generate compilable procedures.We adopt the CrochetPARADE DSL as our intermediate representation, enabling structural validation and functional evaluation via execution.The benchmark covers tasks including stitch classification, instruction grounding, and both natural language and image-to-DSL translation.Across all tasks, performance sharply decreases as the evaluation shifts from surface-level similarity to executable correctness, revealing limitations in long-range symbolic reasoning and 3D-aware procedural synthesis.Our proposed CrochetBench offers a new lens for assessing procedural competence in multimodal models and highlights the gap between surface-level understanding and executable precision in real-world creative domains.Code is available at https://github. com/Peiyu-Georgia-Li/crochetBench. Xiaobao Huang, Ting Hua, Nitesh V. Chawla |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2024 | Application of Large Language Models in Chemistry Reaction Data Extraction and CleaningabstractChemical reaction data has existed and still largely exists in unstructured forms. But curating such information into datasets suitable for tasks such as yield and reaction outcome prediction is impractical via manual curation and not possible to automate through programmatic means alone. Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as potent tools, showcasing remarkable capabilities in processing textual information and therefore could be extremely useful in automating this process. To address the challenge of unstructured data, we manually curated a dataset of structured chemical reaction data to fine-tune and evaluate LLMs. We propose a paradigm that leverages prompt-tuning, fine-tuning techniques, and a verifier to check the extracted information. We evaluate the capabilities of various LLMs, including LLAMA-2 and GPT models with different parameter counts, on the data extraction task. Our results show that prompt tuning of GPT-4 yields the best accuracy and evaluation results. Fine-tuning LLAMA-2 models with hundreds of samples does enable them and organize scientific material according to user-defined schemas better though. This workflow shows an adaptable approach for chemical reaction data extraction but also highlights the challenges associated with nuance in chemical information. We open-sourced our code at https://github.com/joker-bruce/LLM_Extraction_Chem. Xiaobao Huang, Mihir Surve, Yuhan Liu 0010, Tengfei Luo, Olaf Wiest, Xiangliang Zhang 0001, Nitesh V. Chawla |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2024 | ChefFusion: Multimodal Foundation Model Integrating Recipe and Food Image GenerationabstractSignificant work has been conducted in the domain of food computing, yet these studies typically focus on single tasks such as t2t (instruction generation from food titles and ingredients), i2t (recipe generation from food images), or t2i (food image generation from recipes). None of these approaches integrate all modalities simultaneously. To address this gap, we introduce a novel food computing foundation model that achieves true multimodality, encompassing tasks such as t2t, t2i, i2t, it2t, and t2ti. By leveraging large language models (LLMs) and pre-trained image encoder and decoder models, our model can perform a diverse array of food computing-related tasks, including food understanding, food recognition, recipe generation, and food image generation. Compared to previous models, our foundation model demonstrates a significantly broader range of capabilities and exhibits superior performance, particularly in food image generation and recipe generation tasks. We open-sourced ChefFusion at https://github.com/Peiyu-Georgia-Li/ChefFusion-Multimodal-Foundation-Model-Integrating-Recipe-and-Food-Image-Generation.git. Xiaobao Huang, Yijun Tian 0001, Nitesh V. Chawla |
CIKM | 2 |